Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:35 19 Apr 2024
* Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
22:18 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 22:37:35 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[276] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[153] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[57] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[51] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[25] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[23] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [otd] 8th May 1964 - New scheme kills fish traffic by rail  (Read 935 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« on: May 08, 2023, 09:07:46 »

https://www.bloodandcustard.net/bluespot.html

Quote
Following the 1962 Transport Act and Dr Beeching’s drive bring the railways back into profitability there was an imperative to identify and develop profitable traffics with loss-making or only marginally profitable to either be reorganised with realistic pricing else withdrawn. Although BR (British Rail(ways))’s gross receipts were considerable they were not even covering direct costs, let alone making any contribution to track, signalling, administration etc. The average load on the twenty-five fish trains running was around just two tons per van. So whilst many well-used railway freight operations appeared profitable upon closer scrutiny they were being operated at a net loss. Accordingly ‘reshaping’ of the railway’s fish traffic was deemed necessary.

Under the new BR scheme of 8th May 1964 BR wanted to reduce the number of fish trains that leave the four main ports of Aberdeen, Fleetwood, Grimsby and Hull from twenty-five to about nine basic services. This was intended to rationalize the services into a limited number of railheads with onward distribution by road organized by the fish trade.

Across the previous decade there had been a steady erosion of the railways' fish traffic as more of the better loads had gone to road services. By running fewer services it was intended to obtain higher payloads, reduce costs and enable BR to provide realistic competitive rates.

Outside these main flows BR would still consider the possibility of attaching vans of fish to mixed trains leaving the ports although realistically the movement of individual vans and expensive trans-shipment of fish from van to van to supply scattered destinations and sparsely-populated areas was unlikely to prove commercially viable for either BR or fish merchants.

Fish carriage rates were now to be based on wagonload, rather than the previous consignment charging which had previously been very attractive to fish merchants. For many this new system was far less viable both financially and in terms of the service provided. As a consequence ports such as Hull were left with a solitary fish train to London (thence road distribution around the capital) as fish merchants transferred their traffic to road.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page