Recent Public Posts - [guest]
The West Somerset Railway is asking people to suggest a new tagline to emphasize it's coastal destinations. Perhaps the collective creative genius that is the Coffee Shop could come up with a few to help them?
....
I couldn't decide if this merited a new topic, perhaps on the "lighter side", or if it should reside more happily here. Admins, feel free to move this if appropriate.
....
I couldn't decide if this merited a new topic, perhaps on the "lighter side", or if it should reside more happily here. Admins, feel free to move this if appropriate.
Thank you for posting, johnneyw.

As this appeal relates specifically to the West Somerset Railway, and it would seem out of context to start a new topic elsewhere, I'm content to continue the discussion here.
CfN.

I suggested (slightly with tongue in cheek) that they could put a name to some of their seasonal services such as "Bucket and Spade Express" or "Flying Beachcomber".
| Re: Oxford Street, London has been pedestrianised In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [381588/32663/50] Posted by Marlburian at 15:10, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
600 cyclists flout ban
The participants may get something out of it, but such action serves only to annoy a great many other people.
| Free bus plan in Guernsey scrapped over fear it would be too popular In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381587/32685/5] Posted by grahame at 15:03, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
From The BBC
Proposals for a free bus service in Guernsey will no longer be considered for next year's budget, deputies who suggested the move have said.
Deputies Sally Rochester and Ross Le Brun put the plan forward as an amendment to the 2027 budget, asking the Policy and Resources Committee for £1.9m to "enable the existing public transport service" to be made free of charge in a one-year pilot.
They have now pulled the plans after "concern from [operator] Stagecoach" that increased passenger numbers could mean certain routes not coping with the additional demand.
Deputies Sally Rochester and Ross Le Brun put the plan forward as an amendment to the 2027 budget, asking the Policy and Resources Committee for £1.9m to "enable the existing public transport service" to be made free of charge in a one-year pilot.
They have now pulled the plans after "concern from [operator] Stagecoach" that increased passenger numbers could mean certain routes not coping with the additional demand.
The West Somerset Railway is asking people to suggest a new tagline to emphasize it's coastal destinations. Perhaps the collective creative genius that is the Coffee Shop could come up with a few to help them?
Here's the article where I read about it:
https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/26691504.west-somerset-railway-seeks-become-key-coastal-attraction/
I couldn't decide if this merited a new topic, perhaps on the "lighter side", or if it should reside more happily here. Admins, feel free to move this if appropriate.
Here's the article where I read about it:
https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/26691504.west-somerset-railway-seeks-become-key-coastal-attraction/
I couldn't decide if this merited a new topic, perhaps on the "lighter side", or if it should reside more happily here. Admins, feel free to move this if appropriate.
The article says as a caption to the illustration "One of the many trains that pass through Bishops Lydeard Station along the West Somerset Railway line" and on that basis "County Town to Coast Line" would sound appropriate.
The West Somerset Railway is asking people to suggest a new tagline to emphasize it's coastal destinations. Perhaps the collective creative genius that is the Coffee Shop could come up with a few to help them?
Here's the article where I read about it:
https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/26691504.west-somerset-railway-seeks-become-key-coastal-attraction/
I couldn't decide if this merited a new topic, perhaps on the "lighter side", or if it should reside more happily here. Admins, feel free to move this if appropriate.
Edit to add that the only place I could find to make any suggestions to them is from a day old post (2 Nov?) on their Facebook page headed something like "What's in a name".
| Re: Isn't it great that we are all different! Madrid to Narbonne In "Introductions and chat" [381584/32680/1] Posted by grahame at 13:31, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
Not train related but I did wonder if you tried to explain why you couldn't lift their luggage or just politely decline? I have what is an essentially a hidden disability which means I can't lift more than a couple of kilos although I actually look fit and healthy. I've got into argument with couriers who refuse to accept I'm not going to help them carry something as there's 'nothing wrong with you'. Conversely when I started to explain why I can't lift a 25kg bag of salt into the car it got a bit long winded. I've also been told off for 'making' my other half carry the shopping.
I explained that I no longer have the ability to lift heavy weights above my head (and I did not add the words "just like you say you can't"). Sounds very similar to your limits.
With - both - of our limitations, there's a fascinating study for us to see the assumptions people make on sight, how they react, and how much and how often we need to explain.
| Re: Isn't it great that we are all different! Madrid to Narbonne In "Introductions and chat" [381583/32680/1] Posted by Sixty3Closure at 13:04, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
Not train related but I did wonder if you tried to explain why you couldn't lift their luggage or just politely decline? I have what is an essentially a hidden disability which means I can't lift more than a couple of kilos although I actually look fit and healthy. I've got into argument with couriers who refuse to accept I'm not going to help them carry something as there's 'nothing wrong with you'. Conversely when I started to explain why I can't lift a 25kg bag of salt into the car it got a bit long winded. I've also been told off for 'making' my other half carry the shopping.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [381582/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 12:19, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
From National Rail
Route(s) affected
Between Abbey Wood and Heathrow Terminal 4 / Heathrow Terminal 5 / Maidenhead / Reading, and also between Shenfield / London Paddington and Heathrow Terminal 5
Description
A speed restriction over a defective track at Hayes & Harlington means trains will run at a reduced speed on some lines. Trains running between London Paddington and Heathrow Terminals / Reading may be revised.
Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Route(s) affected
Between Abbey Wood and Heathrow Terminal 4 / Heathrow Terminal 5 / Maidenhead / Reading, and also between Shenfield / London Paddington and Heathrow Terminal 5
Description
A speed restriction over a defective track at Hayes & Harlington means trains will run at a reduced speed on some lines. Trains running between London Paddington and Heathrow Terminals / Reading may be revised.
Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Not going down well with the public!!!
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other/major-london-train-line-to-endure-delays-all-day-because-of-defective-track/ar-AA2gEnSJ?ocid=socialshare
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [381581/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 10:32, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
This time last year sunflowers were no problem, but became a problem this year.
They were a problem and identified from the start
Now apparently 2 guards needed when they operate in multiple on lines with short platforms.
Because, when a passcom or call for aid is activated in the rear, unstaffed unit, there's no one to attend the potential emergency or reset the system.
This was't the "novel system" of working multiple units to Barnstaple that Mark Hopgood was talking about earlier.
I suppose the guard could travel in the rear unit and both unit's would be staffed. How did it work in Wales with multiple units or were there no short platforms.
Edit to clarify quoting - Grahame
A pity it wasn't built at a British yard.
That didn't go well for the Scottish Government having their ferries built locally.The clue there is in the words "Scottish Government" - the procurement process was manipulated to favour Ferguson Marine, the yard itself had no experience in constructing the size or type of ferries required for years, they warned they could not hit the financial targets and their bid was the most expensive tendered.
Plenty more detail here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-62839605
The whole thing was a stitch up so that the First Minister could wave a saltire.
| Re: SWR and Reading In "South Western services" [381578/32684/42] Posted by Mark A at 09:10, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
Those will be the ones. Thanks.
Mentioning Napier Road, and not particularly rail-related, that extension of Napier Road that is a footpath - that runs beneath the GWML etc in a deep bridge once used by the rail access to was it the biscuit factory? Looking at that, a bit of a planning fail as whaat could be a quality route for people on foot or cycle, that does exist in some form, but it's wildly dysfunctional and intimidating.
The housing already built there is essentially on an island and at first I was reassured that it's served by a bus - but checking, that seems to be a once-a-day service, the other end of the route being... Goring.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [381577/28982/26] Posted by a-driver at 08:16, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
This time last year sunflowers were no problem, but became a problem this year.
They were a problem and identified from the start
Now apparently 2 guards needed when they operate in multiple on lines with short platforms.
Because, when a passcom or call for aid is activated in the rear, unstaffed unit, there's no one to attend the potential emergency or reset the system.
Edit to clarify quoting - Grahame
A pity it wasn't built at a British yard.
Indeed. Appledore Shipbuilders are still in business, although now Spanish-owned, and I'm pretty sure could have done the work. One assumes cost was the deciding factor.
| Re: Isles of Scilly sea ferry and air services - merged posts In "Buses and other ways to travel" [381575/11098/5] Posted by GBM at 07:51, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
A pity it wasn't built at a British yard.
That didn't go well for the Scottish Government having their ferries built locally.| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [381574/28982/26] Posted by REVUpminster at 07:45, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
This time last year sunflowers were no problem, but became a problem this year.
Now apparently 2 guards needed when they operate in multiple on lines with short platforms.
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [381573/31163/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:33, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
From National Rail
Route(s) affected
Between Abbey Wood and Heathrow Terminal 4 / Heathrow Terminal 5 / Maidenhead / Reading, and also between Shenfield / London Paddington and Heathrow Terminal 5
Description
A speed restriction over a defective track at Hayes & Harlington means trains will run at a reduced speed on some lines. Trains running between London Paddington and Heathrow Terminals / Reading may be revised.
Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
| Re: New TfW services to Bristol in December timetable In "Shorter journeys in South and West Wales" [381572/32236/23] Posted by grahame at 07:22, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
I don't think ORR has approved them (yet), they might still be amended to normal station, a week or two after approval, but they aren't going to meet the industry standard that final timetable should be available for ticket sales minimum 12 weeks ahead.
But ORR has been known to take 18+ months for new service applications, it seems to operate more at glacial pace, than burning midnight oil to produce prompt decisions
But ORR has been known to take 18+ months for new service applications, it seems to operate more at glacial pace, than burning midnight oil to produce prompt decisions
From what I read in Wales Online they are approved now
Transport for Wales (TfW) has been given the go-ahead to run a new cross-border rail service to Bristol. The Welsh Government-owned transport company has secured approval from regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) for a two-hourly service from west Wales to Bristol Temple Meads.
GWR, which currently operates South Wales to Bristol Temple Meads services, had objected, claiming that competition from TfW would lead to revenue extraction. However, from the end of this year, it will come under state ownership.
GWR, which currently operates South Wales to Bristol Temple Meads services, had objected, claiming that competition from TfW would lead to revenue extraction. However, from the end of this year, it will come under state ownership.
| Re: Cornish mainline and branch line delays - ongoing discussion In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [381571/28556/25] Posted by TaplowGreen at 06:49, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Par and Newquay
Due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time between Par and Newquay fewer trains are able to run.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
The train service that runs between Par and Newquay will run as a 2 hourly service due to a fault on one of the train sets.
Alterations to services between St Ives and St Erth
Due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time between St Ives and St Erth:
Train services running to and from these stations may be revised. Disruption is expected until the end of the day on 08/11/26.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Westbury" [381570/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 05:03, 3rd November 2026 | ![]() |
05:11 Gloucester to Southampton Central due 08:10
05:11 Gloucester to Southampton Central due 08:10 will be terminated at Westbury.
It will no longer call at Dilton Marsh, Warminster, Salisbury, Romsey and Southampton Central.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
05:11 Gloucester to Southampton Central due 08:10 will be terminated at Westbury.
It will no longer call at Dilton Marsh, Warminster, Salisbury, Romsey and Southampton Central.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47
06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47 will be started from Westbury.
It will no longer call at Salisbury and Warminster.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47 will be started from Westbury.
It will no longer call at Salisbury and Warminster.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
| Re: SWR and Reading In "South Western services" [381569/32684/42] Posted by Ollie at 00:49, 3rd November 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Suspect you're referring to the office blocks on Napier Road, there were plans submitted to demolish them and build flats. Last I saw in news was that it was rejected and was being appealed.
| SWR and Reading In "South Western services" [381568/32684/42] Posted by Mark A at 22:47, 2nd November 2026 | ![]() |
Sunday, heading up the SWR line from Reading - and felt like a hillbilly living in a wooden shack up on a hill somewhere - because I headed across to that block of terminus platforms for the 9:18 to Gatwick. No sign of it - because it was (audibly) over the other side of the station on platform 15. Made it across though, and, I'm probably the last person, but now I know... I don't know if many others have that experience or how to address it apart from hitting prospective passengers with a clue-stick as they step off an escalator.
The train set off, and in the gloomy light, promptly ran past a series of vandalised broken-windowed graffiti'd 80s(?) office buildings - enough of them to make me wonder if it had run through a jump-gate into another reality, but noooooh, it was still 2026. This before alighting at... Wokingham and a trip into the unknown, across the land of the Atrebates, I was informed.
.
I continue to enjoy seeing images of 'the gurning twonk' (again, his description, not mine!
) on the right in that picture.Why on earth didn't you photo it, if you were there, Justin?

(I do know JayMac personally, by the way - lest any of our readers be startled at my familiarity in such posts).
CfN.

| Re: Trip Report: 14/09 And 30/09/26 To & From Heathrow Airport Via Singapore In "London to the West" [381565/32683/12] Posted by Oxonhutch at 20:57, 2nd November 2026 Already liked by GBM | ![]() |
Changi is indeed a perfect layover. With a 5 hour wait, we checked our hand luggage into 'left luggage', remember those?
We then proceeded through immigration and took a taxi into the centre of town. We ate at the old post office (famous for the photograph of Japanese soldiers at its door) and afterwards, took taxi back to the airport in time for our flight home.
Wonderful time.
Mumsy and I passed that pump-turbine generator building a few weeks ago on our trip on the Festiniog Railway. Didn't photgraph it, but here we are nearby.

| Re: Late November and Christmas closure of Paddington & alternative travel options In "Across the West" [381563/32677/26] Posted by a-driver at 20:29, 2nd November 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
I checked the planner for a journey that I’m rostered to make - Maidenhead to Tottenham Court Road on 28th December. This clocks in at a whopping 2 hours!!
I can’t help but think that the proposed journey is somewhat convoluted and not efficient for the passengers. The proposed plan is train from Maidenhead to Slough, road replacement service to Hillingdon Station(?!?), Hillingdon to Paddington.
Why not take passengers to their intended destination of Paddington rather than doing half the job and dropping them at Hillingdon which incurs a further hour of tube travel after the road replacement service.
I can’t help but think that the proposed journey is somewhat convoluted and not efficient for the passengers. The proposed plan is train from Maidenhead to Slough, road replacement service to Hillingdon Station(?!?), Hillingdon to Paddington.
Why not take passengers to their intended destination of Paddington rather than doing half the job and dropping them at Hillingdon which incurs a further hour of tube travel after the road replacement service.
There's very limited space at Paddington for coaches to park. I'm guessing Hillingdon not only has better access, but parking facilities.
SWTSMBO had already travelled to Singapore to be at the F1 GP on 11/09.
I travelled later to avoid missing 2 x Exeter Chiefs matches & a BSO concert.
(Also given the choice between watching a GP and having my fingernails pulled out I would go for the latter option!)
14/09/26 - Exeter To Heathrow Airport
DIG 1342 (OT) > EXD 1354 (OT) : 2T20 EXM > PGN : 1 x 165/1 (3 Cars)
EXD 1415 (OT) > PAD 1705 (1734) : 1A26 PLY > PAD : 1 x 802/1 (9 Cars)
PAD 1725 > HXX 1740 : 1T73 PAD > HWV (Service Suspended)
Had to use the Elizabeth Line instead.
Tickets (All With Senior Railcard, 1 Pax▸ , Price Per Person):
DIG > PAD 1st Class Advance Single £37.95
PAD > HXX Hex Advance Discounted Single £6.65
Local train reasonably well loaded.
Tickets / railcards checked: No / No
I had booked a reasonably priced 1st Class ticket so as to guarantee use of the Pullman Dining service; shouldn't have bothered as there were only 4 other customers. It was good but not excellent.
1A26 was routed via BRI and ran roughly to time until after DID when the ‘fun’ started. Turned out that the whole PAD-RDG route had been blocked by 'an obstruction on the line’ near Hayes and we reached PAD 29 minutes down.
Having waited for a short time at P6/7 we were eventually told the HEx service had been suspended due to the congestion and we should use Elizabeth Line services instead. The PAD concourse was absolutely rammed - no cats were being swung - with delayed pax and even getting to the specified P14 was a bit of a struggle. Eventually got onto 9H88 which was of course full & standing ( and late!).
Rather amusingly, despite the absolute scrum, the HXX ticket gates were still in use.
30/09/26 - Heathrow Airport To Exeter
HXX 0717 (0723) > PAD 0733 (0741) : 1Y30 HWV > PAD : 2 x 387 (8 Cars)
PAD 0903 (OT) > EXD 1113 (OT) : 1C74 : 1 x 802/0 (5 cars)
EXD 1151 (1154) > DIG 1203 (OT) : 2F15 PGN > EXM : 1 x 150/2 (2 Cars)
Tickets (All With Senior Railcard, 2 Pax, Price Per Person):
HXX > PAD HEx Advance Discounted Single £6.65
PAD > DIG Advance Single £48.25
Many cancelled or late running services in & out of PAD apparently due to a signalling failure in the Slough area. ‘That’s very surprising’ said absolutely nobody. Also SSDD.
1Y30, which was very well loaded due to other binned Heathrow trains, ran through Airport Junction very slowly.
Because our SQ322 flight arrived at LHR an hour early (of which more later*) I looked at changing our tickets so we could travel on the 0803 departure from PAD but GWR wanted just short of £200 for the privilege so that was a definite ‘credit card says no'.
According to a subsequent on board message from the TM 1C74 should have been a 10 car service but even with only 5 it was not that busy. RTT shows that the incoming 1A70 PLY > PAD service was also 5 vice 10 cars. More trains than expected…..
1C74 essentially ran to time for the whole journey (has to happen occasionally).
Tickets / railcards checked: Yes / No
1C74 is timetabled to arrive at EXD at 1113. The 2F14 train to EXM is timetabled to depart EXD at 1115. This is bloody annoying.
As was the provision of a single 150/2 unit on the actual 1151 ‘connection’ to Exmouth on a Friday morning during a half-term. EXD was very busy.
*I don’t mind flying if there is no alternative but I am not generally a fan of all the hanging around in the airport before and after the event. Particularly when it involves London Heathrow. As noted SQ322 arrived an hour early but we were then held on the aircraft at the gate for 20-25 minutes because the cretins at LHR had failed to get the air bridges ready. The obvious conclusion is that they weren’t checking the status of incoming flights and just assumed an ‘as scheduled’ arrival. Then at T2 there is the hike between the satellite and main terminals. And in baggage reclaim it was obvious from the stop-start bag delivery, which took around 30 minutes, that not enough resource is allocated to moving bags from the satellite to the main terminal.
They need to send a team to Changi Airport to find out how to do the job properly. Changi is still the best large airport I have used.














