Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Ideas for a day out? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380469/32559/31] Posted by REVUpminster at 06:36, 5th October 2026 | ![]() |
Google street views are usually undertaken early morning so the camera on the motorcycle can get round without stopping. You often get delivery lorries in the view.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnKPUAL7eO0
| Re: High Streets - thriving, changing, dying in 2026? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380468/32553/31] Posted by Marlburian at 06:28, 5th October 2026 | ![]() |
Since I wrote above about my trip into Reading, there's been a flurry of posts on the local NextDoor site about pickpockets working in a particular locality in the town centre; they can get very aggressive when challenged. The police "are aware of the situation".
| Re: Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos to illustrate press articles In "The Lighter Side" [380467/11558/30] Posted by Marlburian at 06:14, 5th October 2026 | ![]() |
Surely it's St Mawes in Cornwall?
(Sorry, for some reason I can't integrate the actual image into this post.)
| Re: New Dorset transport vision for roads, rail and buses (3.10.2026) In "Heart of Wessex" [380466/32579/19] Posted by Trowres at 01:11, 5th October 2026 | ![]() |
Trowbridge - just for example. 

I can agree with a straight face ( OK a modest grin ).
When I moved in around a quarter of a century ago, it could offer me:
- Work, shops, park all within walking distance along mostly low or zero traffic routes
- Railway station also walkable
- Fantastic countryside surrounding (albeit not so walkable)
We (I'm including myself in that collective term
) are going even more off-topic here, but I found this rather interesting.From the BBC:
US removes all bombers from RAF Fairford base

A Rockwell B1 Lancer heavy bomber takes off to depart for home at RAF Fairford on Sunday - Image © Getty Images
The US has withdrawn all of its bombers from RAF Fairford, the British military base at the centre of an incident being investigated by counter terror police.
A statement from a US department official confirmed on Sunday it had removed all of its bombers from the base back to their home stations in America.
The US did not give a reason for the withdrawal, but it follows a major incident on 27 September when police were alerted to three "suspicious vehicles" near the airbase in Gloucestershire.
Five men were initially arrested on suspicion of terror offences near the base and subsequently released on police bail. A sixth man, a UK-Iranian national, was also later arrested and released on bail.
Whitehall sources have not disputed the decision from Washington was in response to the incident at RAF Fairford.
The BBC has also been told it was a military rather than a political decision - taken at an operational level - and communicated from the US military to its British counterparts.
The UK's Ministry of Defence has not commented.
Days after the incident, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said there were "strong indications" that Iran had played a part in the incident but did not provide further details. Tehran has strongly denied any involvement.
Initially, five men aged between 23 and 25 were arrested in the early hours of the morning after vehicles were reported to be travelling towards the base operated by the US Air Force (USAF). All five were UK nationals from London.
They were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences and later on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act, before being released on bail in what police called an "investigative decision" that was "grounded in experience and strategy".
The sixth man, aged 25, was arrested in London on Thursday on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts. Counter terror police confirmed on Saturday he had also been released on bail.
RAF Fairford has been used as a forward operating location by the US Air Force (USAF) for decades. In recent months, US bombers have taken off from the base for the Middle East, after the UK approved a US request to use it for defensive strikes on Iran.
In July, Iran said "any base used for aggression against Iranian territory constitutes a legitimate target for our forces".
Days after the incident, and before the arrest of the sixth man, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Fox News that it "clearly involve[d] the hands of a foreign actor". Rubio did not provide further details - saying at the time he was limited on what he could say on air.
US President Donald Trump separately said he was "surprised" the five men had been released on bail. "We know everything about them, we would not have released them," he said, adding that the UK had worked with the US "very closely" on this.

A Rockwell B1 Lancer heavy bomber takes off to depart for home at RAF Fairford on Sunday - Image © Getty Images
The US has withdrawn all of its bombers from RAF Fairford, the British military base at the centre of an incident being investigated by counter terror police.
A statement from a US department official confirmed on Sunday it had removed all of its bombers from the base back to their home stations in America.
The US did not give a reason for the withdrawal, but it follows a major incident on 27 September when police were alerted to three "suspicious vehicles" near the airbase in Gloucestershire.
Five men were initially arrested on suspicion of terror offences near the base and subsequently released on police bail. A sixth man, a UK-Iranian national, was also later arrested and released on bail.
Whitehall sources have not disputed the decision from Washington was in response to the incident at RAF Fairford.
The BBC has also been told it was a military rather than a political decision - taken at an operational level - and communicated from the US military to its British counterparts.
The UK's Ministry of Defence has not commented.
Days after the incident, Prime Minister Andy Burnham said there were "strong indications" that Iran had played a part in the incident but did not provide further details. Tehran has strongly denied any involvement.
Initially, five men aged between 23 and 25 were arrested in the early hours of the morning after vehicles were reported to be travelling towards the base operated by the US Air Force (USAF). All five were UK nationals from London.
They were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences and later on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act, before being released on bail in what police called an "investigative decision" that was "grounded in experience and strategy".
The sixth man, aged 25, was arrested in London on Thursday on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts. Counter terror police confirmed on Saturday he had also been released on bail.
RAF Fairford has been used as a forward operating location by the US Air Force (USAF) for decades. In recent months, US bombers have taken off from the base for the Middle East, after the UK approved a US request to use it for defensive strikes on Iran.
In July, Iran said "any base used for aggression against Iranian territory constitutes a legitimate target for our forces".
Days after the incident, and before the arrest of the sixth man, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Fox News that it "clearly involve[d] the hands of a foreign actor". Rubio did not provide further details - saying at the time he was limited on what he could say on air.
US President Donald Trump separately said he was "surprised" the five men had been released on bail. "We know everything about them, we would not have released them," he said, adding that the UK had worked with the US "very closely" on this.
This is a response from the USA's Department of War (recently re-designated from Department of Defence by Donald Trump himself). The USA is apparently pulling out, militarily.
In view of this development, may I please ask for members here 'broadgage' to send me the plans for building an above-ground bunker and for 'TaplowGreen' for his inclusion of a sliding roof in such a structure. Any updated suggestions as to what particular items of food and drink should be stockpiled will also be much appreciated.
CfN.

Someone who uses 'faceplant' (I don't
) could perhaps point out to "James Buczkowski [councillor] for Cullompton, Bradninch and Kentisbeare" that (for probably an additional £1 million) he could get an appropriate lift / stairway structure for the right-hand side of that footbridge - rather than it just going into a tree.| Re: Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos to illustrate press articles In "The Lighter Side" [380463/11558/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:53, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Argh! Grahame clickbaited me into visiting F***book - again! I must be more careful.
That's Dartmouth - or possibly Kingsbridge, or Salcombe.
| Re: Ideas for a day out? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380462/32559/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:35, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
When I find out the right way to condense the long-winded Streetview URLs into something neat for a message on this forum, I will post a few examples of what (for me, anyway) makes or breaks a potential destination.
My learned mentor grahame will be happy to help you with that. Please do go ahead and post such examples.

| Re: Ideas for a day out? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380461/32559/31] Posted by Trowres at 22:56, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
All the suggested place you could walk round on GoogleEarth.
I had a look at some of the places using Google Streetview. Perhaps a topic for another thread: "Does Streetview make places look more dismal than they really are?"
When I find out the right way to condense the long-winded Streetview URLs into something neat for a message on this forum, I will post a few examples of what (for me, anyway) makes or breaks a potential destination.
| Re: New Dorset transport vision for roads, rail and buses (3.10.2026) In "Heart of Wessex" [380460/32579/19] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:49, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Trowbridge - just for example.

| Re: New Dorset transport vision for roads, rail and buses (3.10.2026) In "Heart of Wessex" [380459/32579/19] Posted by Trowres at 22:35, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
...
Good transport links help all kinds of businesses, those hoping to attract customers to buy their goods and services and those looking to recruit good staff.
Good transport links help all kinds of businesses, those hoping to attract customers to buy their goods and services and those looking to recruit good staff.
Mmm... yes, good transport links might increase the pool of potential employees by widening the area within a certain commute time...
... but if you want to attract from over a really wide area (like the whole country), it helps to be located somewhere with a high quality urban environment and good lifestyle opportunities.
| Re: Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations (merged topic) In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [380457/5272/28] Posted by Oxonhutch at 22:16, 4th October 2026 Already liked by PhilWakely | ![]() |
Driving 'bang road' for one - but then again. where is the real track it should be on?
Train station returning to village after more than 100 years
Where on earth has it been wandering in the interim?
| Re: Reported assaults on Britain's rail services rise by more than a third In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380455/32536/51] Posted by Trowres at 21:58, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Simply shocking
You have to wonder why the more "anti violence" measures and response policing we have, the worse the situation becomes. Some people's willingness to be violent in an an attempt to get their way is simply startling.
<snip>
You have to wonder why the more "anti violence" measures and response policing we have, the worse the situation becomes. Some people's willingness to be violent in an an attempt to get their way is simply startling.
<snip>
Well, the headlines are designed to be shocking. I'm rather surprised that the ORR (which should know better) focuses on the change between a single pair of years.
Have a look at the tables for 2004-2026 at https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/health-and-safety/rail-safety/table-5206-workforce-and-non-workforce-assaults/ , remembering that double-counting is inherent in the national network figures (a single incident can be included in more than one category).
My quick takeaways on non-workforce assaults (table 5206b):
- There are some significant changes in the 2000s and 2010s. Why?
- GBH incidents in the first 5 years averaged 146.6; in the final 5 years: 146.8
It's also worth understanding what is being counted: see https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/1230/rail-safety-statistics-quality-report.pdf
| Re: Industrial Heritage in Wiltshire conference majoring on railways - 24.10.2026 In "Diary - what's happening when?" [380454/32578/34] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:26, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
That's a relatively small round of drinks in a pub, these days.

Thanks, bobm.

| Re: Engineering works 10 - 16 October 2026 In "London to Kennet Valley" [380453/32260/8] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:22, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
... and yes, before Coffee Shop forum member TaplowGreen even gets here, they were possibly headed towards a GWR weekend barbeque.

| Re: Industrial Heritage in Wiltshire conference majoring on railways - 24.10.2026 In "Diary - what's happening when?" [380452/32578/34] Posted by bobm at 21:21, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Just to note it’s £18.50 “a stroll”.
| Re: Engineering works 10 - 16 October 2026 In "London to Kennet Valley" [380451/32260/8] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:18, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
We would be grateful if you were able to cascade this to your networks and, if you have any questions, please do get in touch.
Best wishes, Olivia & Heledd
Olivia Willett | Deputy Head of Public Affairs | Great Western Railway
E: olivia.willett@GWR.com
Heledd Iolo | Senior Public Affairs Manager | Network Rail
E: heledd.iolo@networkrail.co.uk
If I may perhaps share some of grahame's understandable frustration here: Olivia & Heledd both offer their first names, as a friendly point of contact - but then they both leave the office over the weekend.
CfN.

| Re: Some Site Statistics In "News, Help and Assistance" [380450/10588/29] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:35, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
I add to my intelligence on these pages and I am very much real. (Quiet at the back.
)
)My colleague bobm on this forum is indeed very much real - and very intelligent (despite having previously been a professional journalist).
I recently enjoyed a couple of chats over a pint of beer in Swindon with him. I won't share his own apparent statistics here, but he is perhaps a 'larger than life' character.

My regards to bobm. CfN.

Well, there's no GWR steam engine, for a start.

CfN.

| Re: Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations (merged topic) In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [380448/5272/28] Posted by PhilWakely at 19:12, 4th October 2026 Already liked by trainbuff | ![]() |
The following image has been taken from a recent facebook post by James Buczkowski [councillor] for Cullompton, Bradninch and Kentisbeare following a recent meeting of the Devon & Somerset Metro Board

How many glaring errors can you find in this AI generated image
| Re: Industrial Heritage in Wiltshire conference majoring on railways - 24.10.2026 In "Diary - what's happening when?" [380447/32578/34] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:00, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
For perhaps somewhat inexplicable reasons, I may well find myself in Wiltshire and free on that day: I may well stroll along.

| Re: Reported assaults on Britain's rail services rise by more than a third In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380446/32536/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:44, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
There is: I've now merged them here.
CfN.

From the BBC:
Train station returning to village after more than 100 years

A computer generated image shows how the new station in the village of Cheadle will look - Image © Pell Frischmann
Work is beginning on bringing a train station back to the heart of a Greater Manchester village more than a century after its original station closed.
Cheadle in Stockport had a station just off the high street up until 1917.
Funding for a new hub, which would be built next to Alexandra Hospital, was given the green light in 2022, with planning permission granted in 2023 but concerns about its effect on the timetabling of trains elsewhere on the network led to delays.
Stockport Council said the issue had now been resolved and council leader Mark Roberts said it was "a hugely significant moment for Cheadle and for Stockport. For years we've fought for this station because we know the difference it will make to residents, businesses and the future prosperity of the area," he added.
Roberts said he was delighted that the initial highways work could now start on site thanks to the persistence and partnership of all involved.
Services are expected to run from Cheadle into Stockport town, Manchester Piccadilly and Chester, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.
The project had been held up by an unresolved timetabling issue over concerns the new station could impact trains elsewhere on the network, with a previous proposal made to remove services at Ashley and Plumley.
Stockport Council said the latest assessment by Network Rail and Northern Trains concluded that Cheadle Station could be introduced without removing a significant barrier that had put the project at risk and these plans have now been dropped.

A computer generated image shows the aerial view of the new station - Image © Pell Frischmann
Brian Bradley, chair of the Cheadle Towns Fund Board, said it was "a fantastic milestone for Cheadle and a moment that many people have worked hard to achieve over a number of years".
Cheadle MP Tom Morrison said getting to this point had been a real team effort, adding: "Cheadle has waited more than 100 years for a station, and now it's finally happening. It will connect our 23,000 residents to jobs, schools and opportunities across Greater Manchester, and take traffic off our busy roads."
Cheadle Hulme North councillor David Meller, who helped kickstart the plans for the new station, said: "To see that we're finally there is incredible."

A computer generated image shows how the new station in the village of Cheadle will look - Image © Pell Frischmann
Work is beginning on bringing a train station back to the heart of a Greater Manchester village more than a century after its original station closed.
Cheadle in Stockport had a station just off the high street up until 1917.
Funding for a new hub, which would be built next to Alexandra Hospital, was given the green light in 2022, with planning permission granted in 2023 but concerns about its effect on the timetabling of trains elsewhere on the network led to delays.
Stockport Council said the issue had now been resolved and council leader Mark Roberts said it was "a hugely significant moment for Cheadle and for Stockport. For years we've fought for this station because we know the difference it will make to residents, businesses and the future prosperity of the area," he added.
Roberts said he was delighted that the initial highways work could now start on site thanks to the persistence and partnership of all involved.
Services are expected to run from Cheadle into Stockport town, Manchester Piccadilly and Chester, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.
The project had been held up by an unresolved timetabling issue over concerns the new station could impact trains elsewhere on the network, with a previous proposal made to remove services at Ashley and Plumley.
Stockport Council said the latest assessment by Network Rail and Northern Trains concluded that Cheadle Station could be introduced without removing a significant barrier that had put the project at risk and these plans have now been dropped.

A computer generated image shows the aerial view of the new station - Image © Pell Frischmann
Brian Bradley, chair of the Cheadle Towns Fund Board, said it was "a fantastic milestone for Cheadle and a moment that many people have worked hard to achieve over a number of years".
Cheadle MP Tom Morrison said getting to this point had been a real team effort, adding: "Cheadle has waited more than 100 years for a station, and now it's finally happening. It will connect our 23,000 residents to jobs, schools and opportunities across Greater Manchester, and take traffic off our busy roads."
Cheadle Hulme North councillor David Meller, who helped kickstart the plans for the new station, said: "To see that we're finally there is incredible."
| Re: Wiltshire Strategic Freight Strategy consultation closes 23.9.2026 In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Westbury" [380444/32516/18] Posted by eXPassenger at 18:16, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Thank you.
The passing of Dame Esther Rantzen has prompted renewed coverage of one her most memorable episodes of the television series, 'That's Life'.
Sir Nicholas Winton appeared in that episode, unaware that he was surrounded in the seating area by many of the surviving children he had saved.
The BBC have published an update article: it contains edited highlights from that episode of 'That' Life', which I commend you to read throughout (the video clip within it is just over one minute - please do watch that throughout).
CfN.

| Re: Some Site Statistics In "News, Help and Assistance" [380442/10588/29] Posted by eightonedee at 16:46, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Perhaps when Grok, Claude and their mates scrape through our forum's site, they might help Vaishnavi Pandey at Secret London find some more appropriate pictures of Cullompton and Wellington for her next on-line article.
| Re: Celebrating 125 years of Reading Buses In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380441/32581/5] Posted by eightonedee at 16:30, 4th October 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks BobM.
I'm feeling old. It's mostly the older ones shown in these photos that I remember travelling on, including the trolleybus. Not the pre-war AEC the right in the 5th photo though!
I think there's already a thread on this somewhere?















