This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
12.8.2025 (Tuesday) 00:12 - All running AOK
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364137/30562/5]
Posted by broadgage at 22:27, 11th August 2025
 
In my view, ALL drivers should be required to pass a sight test, before a licence is granted, and every 10 years thereafter, and every few years for over 70s. those who pass, but only by a small margin, should be re tested more frequently.
All drivers involved in a serious accident should be tested for sight, and for general fitness to drive.

I have previously spoken in favour, of small lightweight, and speed limited cars, known in Europe as VSPs. drivers of such vehicles should still be subject to sight testing, but a slightly lower standard would be acceptable.

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364136/30562/5]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:31, 11th August 2025
Already liked by Mark A
 
In context, I am aged 66 - never mind 'three score years and ten'. 

Until I retired recently, I was a grocery delivery van driver. In my most recent 'independent' assessment, by a qualified RAC examiner, he passed me, while suggesting that I could perhaps get my eyesight prescription checked.

I did so - and, to my surprise, found that my eyesight had actually improved slightly since my previous prescription.  One new pair of glasses later, I was very happy. 

CfN. 

Re: Trains not calling at Crewkerne from 28 July 2025
In "South Western services" [364135/30480/42]
Posted by bradshaw at 21:00, 11th August 2025
 

It is not just the WoE that is affecred by this dry spell.
Shenfield to Southend Victoria/Southminster is also affecred.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0e99d14ngpo

Re: pilot scheme in Scotland for cheap fares
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [364132/27142/51]
Posted by grahame at 19:25, 11th August 2025
 
From The Lochside Press

Peak fares are set to be scrapped ‘for good’ by ScotRail services in three weeks’ time.

The policy reversal announced by the Scottish Government in May this year will take effect on Monday September 1, with officials saying they aim to make train fares simpler, more flexible, and provide better value for money for rail users, as well as getting more people to leave the car at home and travel by rail instead.

Removing peak fares will mean significant savings for customers, with some journeys set to reduce by almost 50% as people pay the same fare no matter what time they travel, or the day of the week.

The price of a return ticket from Helensburgh Central to Glasgow, leaving before 9am, will fall from £14 to £8.90.

Peak fares were dropped in September 2023 but then reintroduced 12 months later, with Ministers saying it would have required a 10% increase in passenger numbers for the policy to be self-financing and they would only to reintroduce to if given more money by Westminster.

But today Cabinet Secretary for Transport Fiona Hyslop said: “Public ownership has created the opportunity to deliver a railway which is run for the benefit of the nation. ScotRail is one of the fastest growing operators, with one of the best passenger satisfaction rates and we are building even further on this success by removing peak fares for good.

“We want more people to choose to travel by public transport for work, study and leisure but we know that many are still struggling with cost-of-living pressures.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [364131/29726/18]
Posted by bobm at 19:21, 11th August 2025
 
There may be fuel or maintenance considerations in play, I don't know.    The unit removed at Bristol Temple Meads usually goes to St Philips Marsh overnight and then comes out to form the 05:51 to Portsmouth Harbour the following morning.

Re: Boardmasters Festival - annual music event each August in Cornwall (merged posts)
In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [364130/18576/25]
Posted by RailCornwall at 19:07, 11th August 2025
 
Interesting that large numbers (relatively) of passengers made there way to other stations in Cornwall this morning to depart avoiding the Newquay queues. Most east bound services were reported full and standing before arriving at Truro which must have added to the transport issues surrounding the 2025 iteration of the festival.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [364129/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 19:02, 11th August 2025
 
After twenty to seven in the evening, the Cardiff -> Portsmouth service is not going to be rammed - any chance of dropping 2 cars of one of the longer ones to maintain service?   

The train from Portsmouth to Cardiff that calls at 19:11 is 2x158s this evening, one of which is detached at Temple Meads anyway.  Just saying.  It would be significantly late up to Swindon but has a long layover there so the rest of the evening service would be saved and on time.  Just wondering what I have missed ...

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [364128/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 18:55, 11th August 2025
 
Here we (don't) go again

18:37 Westbury to Swindon due 19:21
20:12 Swindon to Westbury due 20:56
21:16 Westbury to Swindon due 21:58
22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12

22:31 Swindon to Westbury due 23:12 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.

After twenty to seven in the evening, the Cardiff -> Portsmouth service is not going to be rammed - any chance of dropping 2 cars of one of the longer ones to maintain service?   

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364127/30562/5]
Posted by grahame at 18:48, 11th August 2025
Already liked by TaplowGreen, Mark A
 
From The Telegraph via Facebook



Yes - but if there is a significant risk of you changing the life of others you'll just have to accept the life change. Perhaps even see it as a new start or phase.  This story highlights the impact of the changes on people.   My understanding is that the proposal is not to take away license at 90, but to take away licenses if and when your reduced eyesight means you can no longer drive safely

Re: Cumbrian Coast Line: tunnel woes at Whitehaven
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [364126/30530/51]
Posted by grahame at 18:35, 11th August 2025
 
First indication of how it will be fixed and how long it will take
https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/whitehaven-tunnel-to-remain-closed-but-trains-now-running-north

Design teams are working hard to come up with a solution to strengthen the tunnel floor so the planned track and drainage renewals can take place.

This additional design work has delayed the August and September work, with the tunnel expected to be closed for several months.

Re: Man seeks stranger who saved him from train tracks - Cheltenham Spa, 10 Jul 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [364125/30561/51]
Posted by Clan Line at 18:30, 11th August 2025
 
A spokesperson for GWR said: "We're pleased to hear that the customer wasn't more seriously hurt in this incident, and we commend our station staff for their swift response. While accidents can happen, the railway presents significant risks. For everyone's safety, passengers should never enter the track. Instead, please immediately contact a member of staff who can safely stop all trains and assist you."

I have to say that I find the final paragraph in the GWR statement somewhat distasteful (and, regrettably, predictable) - it praises the "station staff for their swift response" - then goes on to "tick off" the man for taking immediate action. I must suppose the mystery man was expected to produce his phone and send a text to 61016.................and look around for (probably) non-existent staff. I daresay he knew full well that jumping down onto the track was not the safest thing to do - but his concern for the fallen passenger overcame his concern for his own safety. People used to get the George Cross for that - now they get b*******d by someone in GWR's ivory tower.

How about GWR saying "well done sir" to the unknown man - at the very least    Fat chance  !!

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364123/30562/5]
Posted by Mark A at 18:03, 11th August 2025
 
An eyesight test that requires the driver to be able to read a numberplate at 20 metres is archaic: it has never has been fit for purpose and needs to be ... retired.

Also, does some consideration need to be given to driving with varifocals? They can be fine, but depending on the lens used, thinking of distance vision, not all varifocals provide good focus across a wide visual field. Many users of varifocals will be lifelong wearers of specs, which might indicate that sight tests and requirements shouldn't be tied to age but should apply to anyone who drives a vehicle.

Mark

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364122/30562/5]
Posted by eXPassenger at 17:54, 11th August 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, Mark A
 
I think this is a sensible requirement.  I have glaucoma and require a DVLA eye test every 3 years when my licence is renewed.

I would like to see requirements added for younger drivers that would prevent them taking passengers, under say 25, for 6 months after passing their test.

Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain
In "TransWilts line" [364121/30565/18]
Posted by Mark A at 17:33, 11th August 2025
 
Up to London the other week and saw the capacity enhancement just past Thingley - not unfortunately the doubling of Thingley to Trowbridge, this involved the A350 road, where work is in progress to use the passive provision for a second carriageway beneath the GWML to enable it to carry the northbound lanes of the newly dualled A350. Immediate flashbacks to that rail-orientated meeting that included pale DfT types with their persistent riffing on the need to 'Save taxpayers' money' at which two (women) taxpayers and now former users of rail travel, walked out.

In these times, as ever, it's useful to keep in mind the counterpoint when an official says 'There's no money'.

Mark

Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain
In "TransWilts line" [364120/30565/18]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:46, 11th August 2025
 
^   ^
:     :


What he said. 


EasyJet pilot suspended after 'drunk and naked' incident - 5 August 2025
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [364119/30566/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:40, 11th August 2025
 
From the BBC:



EasyJet has suspended one of its captains after he was reportedly seen roaming a luxury hotel drunk and naked.

The unnamed pilot was witnessed walking through common areas of a five-star resort in Cape Verde without any clothes on in the early hours of the morning on 5 August, after an extended drinking session in a bar, according to the Sun. He was due to operate a return flight to Gatwick more than 36 hours later, but was grounded after the budget airline received complaints about the incident and a replacement pilot found.

An EasyJet spokesman told the BBC the pilot now faces an investigation and that the safety of passengers and crew was its "highest priority".

The captain arrived at the Melia Dunas Beach Resort and Spa in the West African island nation on 4 August and proceeded to begin drinking, the Sun reports.

At around 02:30 local time (04:30 BST) the following morning, hotel guests reportedly saw him strip off and wander into the reception, before moving on to the gym and spa, according to the newspaper.

"The pilot did not have a stitch on and reeked of alcohol," an anonymous source inside the airline was quoted by the paper as saying. "Anyone who saw the pilot cavorting naked in the early hours on the day before a flight would not dream of getting on a plane with him at the controls."

He was scheduled to helm the 2,332-nautical-mile (4,318km) trip back to Gatwick on the afternoon of 6 August, but was removed from the flight.

An EasyJet spokesman said: "As soon as we were made aware, the pilot was immediately stood down from duty, in line with our procedures, pending an investigation. The safety of our passengers and crew is EasyJet's highest priority."

The airline's code of business ethics states that staff must behave "with integrity when dealing with our people, our customers, our partners and the communities within which we operate".


[otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain
In "TransWilts line" [364118/30565/18]
Posted by grahame at 16:27, 11th August 2025
 
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk. (note - old URL is still http not https)

On 11th August 2005 I registered savethetrain.org.uk, looking at a project that lasted perhaps for a few months and here were are 20 years later.    Things have move on - somewhat - but the project remains live and to this day we have serious issues with service reliability, with the service being very much on the sparse end of what's appropriate and works, and with connectivity within Melksham to other public transport being, frankly none-existent.   BUT we are up from 26 trains timetable to call per week to 118 per week, now spread across all hours and all days of the week.   Our platform has been lengthened to take three carriages rather than one, and the old single carriage train retired (it was getting too full to take any more passengers at peak times) and replaced by 2 or 3 carriage ones.

But there is still work to be done.   What I wrote 8 years ago ...

February 2017 ...

The "Save the Train" campaign was created in 2005 at a time when the whole future of passenger trains calling at Melksham Station was in doubt. Services held on by a thread through to 2010, with a strong local campaign. Objectives were to establish a permanent, appropriate train for Melksham's station, the line through it, and the communities served. Steps towards that objective:
* to raise awareness of the issues (2005 to 2009)
* to evaluate what's an appropriate service (2009 to 2011)
* to work towards that appropriate service (gain) (2012 and 2013)
* to ensure that an appropriate service is retained (2013 onward)

Over the years, the group moved from being protesters to being partners, working with local and central government, businesses in the area served, train operators and the rest of the rail industry, other user and community groups. As we shifted from protest to partner, we formed the "TransWilts Community Rail Partnership". Initially TransWilts worked as a group working within the community, then with First Great Western (now GWR) support, adding Wiltshire Council and central government though a Local Sustainable Transport Fund (LSTF) grant. Once the service was up and running on a trial basis, TransWilts was able to join ACoRP (the Association of Community Rail Partnerhips) - a Department for Transport sponsored organisation to help put new life into local lines. And as the service became permanent in December 2016, the service has become "designated" with gives the partneship some further authority / input, in particlar allowing local variation of national standards and policy where that works for the towns served.

Passenger journey numbers to, from and through Melksham - that's the line section unique to the TransWilts - were about 18,000 per annum when we started and are now up to a quarter of a million. Train service is up from 2 each way per day to 9 each way per day, passenger journey numbers at Melksham Station up from 3,000 per annum to around 60,000 per annum. The original trains still run - but where they had 2 or 3 passengers they're now conveying up to 30, and some of the new trains are full and standing (but if you're a potential passenger, there's still room for a few more on board).

There's still campaining and collaboration work to do - modelling suggests that Melksham passenger journeys can rise 5 times more to around 300,000 per annum - and for that we need a longer platform (project underway), longer trains (also underway) and more of them. And we need to improve access to Melksham station away from the tracks, and get the town's bus service to connect with the train rather than ignoring it.

Yes - the campaign has been successful - but that very success tells us that we're not where we should be yet and need to keep working for more and longer trains - and indeed link them into other trains beyond Westbury to Salisbury, and to Southampton and the airport.

-- Update by Graham Ellis, February 2017

... episode 2 to follow

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364111/30562/5]
Posted by CyclingSid at 15:20, 11th August 2025
Already liked by Mark A
 
The three score and ten is vanishing in the rear view mirror.

I haven't driven in about 40 years, the driving licence acts as an ID, because of the strange attitude to such things in this country. Somebody said that their store loyalty card probably knows more about them than HMG.

I have no intention of ever driving again, the view from the bike definitely puts me off. I don't know about the eyesight of drivers, the main problem is the attitude of many which has little to do with age.

I was having my lunchtime break on one of my cycle rides and I said that "I haven't driven in about 40 years", and they kept repeating it during the rest of our conversation. Almost as thou I had been clean of some noxious substances. Shows how ingrained driving is to people lives.

Re: Heathrow Airport - plans for expansion: ongoing discussion, merged posts
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364110/22971/5]
Posted by TonyK at 15:02, 11th August 2025
 
Seems Alaska Air is coming to Heathrow

https://news.alaskaair.com/destinations/alaska-airlines-continues-international-expansion-with-new-flights-to-london-and-reykjavik-from-seattle-with-a-first-look-at-our-new-global-experience/


Baffles me how they got the slots, unless there's a code share with another airline.

Back on again.............

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj6yz77nlw4o

As I said earlier,

I say "when" rather than "if", because it will be the only certain end to this long-running saga. No other outcome will be anything other than a postponement unless a practical alternative to the large aircraft can be found for international travel within the next 5 years.

The debates started before the second runway was complete at the Heathrow Airport we now know. The first cancellation of the third runway to the north of the existing two was in 1953.  There could well be more to come.

Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old?
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364109/30562/5]
Posted by TonyK at 15:01, 11th August 2025
 
Amazingly, I am nearing three score and ten myself. I have an annual eye test, and have no problem with sharing the result with DVSA. The optician always tells me whether I am legal to drive, with or as at present since the MkII eyeballs, without specs. I also have a routine monthly or so to self-assess. At our local market, I know where I can stand 25 metres from the closest car in the car park. Last weekend, I could read the number plate without problem, putting me 25% above the minimum. The I can't, or the optician advises me against driving, I will stop.

I knew two people who continued to drive after being registered blind, one of whom went so far as to decline the offer of early restoration of his licence after a ban, for fear of being found out. I also know at least two octogenarian pilots who are examined annually by a CAA approved examiner, and pass fit to fly. So let's not demonise the elderly for being old, but I am very much in favour of having to submit an eyesight test report when renewing ones driving licence at 70, and every 3 years thereafter, with proactive steps being taken to check licence holders who don't. I'm happy to be the first.

Re: Tube staff face deportation under new visa rules - August 2025
In "Transport for London" [364108/30556/46]
Posted by Mark A at 14:27, 11th August 2025
 
People then need to consider the circumstances that have produced that large unruly group of people.

(Somewhat trivialising this, the last time I was part of something that tended towards being a rabble, it was at Paddington and contributing to the 'Rabble quality' was the quantity of passengers alighting from a full and sardine-packed standing hour-delayed 10 carriage IEP onto the very constrained country end of the likes of Paddington platform 5. A useful experience in some ways as I have a plan for the next time that happens which involves nipping to the platform end and waiting till things calm down. Other people's choices, in very different circumstances may be more limited in scope.)

Mark

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025