Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:55 06 May 2024
* Starliner: Nasa to fly new craft to space station
* Train strikes: How May's disruption affects you
- Eurotunnel says no queues with new travel system
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
6th May (2005)
DfT / SRA future service level discussion (*)

Train RunningCancelled
04:57 Plymouth to Gunnislake
05:00 Reading to Redhill
05:14 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
05:42 Gunnislake to Plymouth
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:43 Redhill to Reading
06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
07:03 Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton
08:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
11:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
14:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
20:58 Frome to Westbury
21:28 Weymouth to Westbury
21:33 Westbury to Salisbury
21:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
22:02 Marlow to Maidenhead
22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
07/05/24 00:17 Marlow to Maidenhead
07/05/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
07/05/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
05:11 Gloucester to Southampton Central
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:19 Taunton to Cardiff Central
08:23 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
08:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
09:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
11:52 London Paddington to Hereford
12:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:18 Hereford to London Paddington
15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:45 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 06, 2024, 03:09:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] Server load - 5th May 2024
[53] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[51] Walking between stations
[48] Something different !
[47] Champion to Westbury
[46] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The final batches of trains from York works - two different futures  (Read 2914 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40872



View Profile WWW Email
« on: May 15, 2021, 05:51:53 »

The electric class 365 - the final trains manufactured at York Works - are withdrawn from service this weekend. Classes 165 anad 166 - diesel trains manufactured at the same works a little earlier and externally looking similar - are the "new" trains we have received in the Bristol / West area in the last few years. 

As local / short distance trains, we have much to thank the 165/166 units for; being 2 and 3 carriages replacing the 1 carriage 153s has done necessary wonders for capacity. But isn't it a bit ironic that the older diesel trains remain for the at least the medium term, when the newer electric trains are gone?  Wouldn't it have been better to have done some more electrification so that the electric trains, which should have a longer and cleaner life anyway, could have continued in productive service?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40872



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2021, 09:00:50 »

I have just noticed - we have reached a milestone - this is topic number 25,000!

.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1538



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2021, 10:43:35 »

I for one am sorry to see them being withdrawn. On the few occasions I travelled on them they struck me as a much more comfortable experience than their Turbo cousins, not least because they had 4 across seating not 5.

No doubt someone on this forum will tell me why it cannot be done, but they look a better basis for conversion to bi- or tri-mode operation then the (older still)319/769s we are getting on the North Downs, at least from the passengers' point of view, especially for passengers to and from Gatwick with luggage.  Too late now I guess.
Logged
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2021, 13:16:51 »

I for one am sorry to see them being withdrawn. On the few occasions I travelled on them they struck me as a much more comfortable experience than their Turbo cousins, not least because they had 4 across seating not 5.

No doubt someone on this forum will tell me why it cannot be done, but they look a better basis for conversion to bi- or tri-mode operation then the (older still)319/769s we are getting on the North Downs, at least from the passengers' point of view, especially for passengers to and from Gatwick with luggage.  Too late now I guess.
I think I read in Modern Railways a few months back that some of the middle cars may be used to lengthen the Class 165s to 5 cars with a hydrive conversion (whatever that is), if the prototype is successful. Quite whether any proposal that increases capacity is likely to see the light of day in the current environment must be very doubtful however. The project may already have died a death.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2021, 13:43:32 »

The electric class 365 - the final trains manufactured at York Works - are withdrawn from service this weekend. Classes 165 anad 166 - diesel trains manufactured at the same works a little earlier and externally looking similar - are the "new" trains we have received in the Bristol / West area in the last few years. 

As local / short distance trains, we have much to thank the 165/166 units for; being 2 and 3 carriages replacing the 1 carriage 153s has done necessary wonders for capacity. But isn't it a bit ironic that the older diesel trains remain for the at least the medium term, when the newer electric trains are gone?  Wouldn't it have been better to have done some more electrification so that the electric trains, which should have a longer and cleaner life anyway, could have continued in productive service?

Awkward moments part 1 - When you settle down for a programme called "AC Grayling" and realise it's about philosophy rather than a documentary on succesive government's faliures on rail electrification...
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6439


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2021, 14:07:44 »


Awkward moments part 1 - When you settle down for a programme called "AC Grayling" and realise it's about philosophy rather than a documentary on succesive government's faliures on rail electrification...

I think that hints broadly at the answer. EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) have a lifespan. The 365s reached it after a midlife refurb, and unusually have been retired. DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), and the High Speed Train's (HST (High Speed Train))s, were deployed as a stopgap until electrification could be completed. Replacing them with a new diesel model would be an admission of failure, and would probably kick off yet another scrap with the environmentalists. They would ask, not unreasonably, why a government that says it is committed to the end of new fossil fuel cars in 2030 is commissioning new diesel trains that will be running 20 years after that. So the 165s get a Trigger's broom-style makeover and a welcome bordering on rapture at their new homes.

By 2060 the best paid jobs will be in keeping petrol and diesel engines working for a few months longer.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 17, 2021, 16:42:53 by VickiS » Logged

Now, please!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2021, 16:00:00 »

I for one am sorry to see them being withdrawn. On the few occasions I travelled on them they struck me as a much more comfortable experience than their Turbo cousins, not least because they had 4 across seating not 5.

No doubt someone on this forum will tell me why it cannot be done, but they look a better basis for conversion to bi- or tri-mode operation then the (older still)319/769s we are getting on the North Downs, at least from the passengers' point of view, especially for passengers to and from Gatwick with luggage.  Too late now I guess.
I think I read in Modern Railways a few months back that some of the middle cars may be used to lengthen the Class 165s to 5 cars with a hydrive conversion (whatever that is), if the prototype is successful. Quite whether any proposal that increases capacity is likely to see the light of day in the current environment must be very doubtful however. The project may already have died a death.

HyDrive is name used by Magtec for their diesel/battery drive systems, and for a prototype they are doing for Angel and Chiltern based on a 165. It involves taking off the motors and drives, and fitting smaller motors, batteries, and a new motor driving the existing bogies. It was meant to be out on trial in 2019, but is still in the works. Angel released what looks like an older video (and is very date-free) in March this year.

I can see why Magtec want to use one of their own, new and efficient, motors. But it still seems on the surface to be a better trick to play on 365s, which already have bogie-mounted 3-phase motors. Even if you want to replace the GTO thyristor drives (old, but which can do regeneration), it seems like less work.

Plus, as of this week, someone in DfT» (Department for Transport - about) (who own a load of those 365s, as it happens) may have been having a rethink about the value having of old DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) sitting in sidings - just in case.
Logged
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2021, 16:27:04 »


HyDrive is name used by Magtec for their diesel/battery drive systems, and for a prototype they are doing for Angel and Chiltern based on a 165. It involves taking off the motors and drives, and fitting smaller motors, batteries, and a new motor driving the existing bogies. It was meant to be out on trial in 2019, but is still in the works. Angel released what looks like an older video (and is very date-free) in March this year.

I can see why Magtec want to use one of their own, new and efficient, motors. But it still seems on the surface to be a better trick to play on 365s, which already have bogie-mounted 3-phase motors. Even if you want to replace the GTO thyristor drives (old, but which can do regeneration), it seems like less work.

Plus, as of this week, someone in DfT» (Department for Transport - about) (who own a load of those 365s, as it happens) may have been having a rethink about the value having of old DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) sitting in sidings - just in case.


Thanks! I appreciate the explanation.
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1345



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2021, 21:53:21 »

The 365s have been handed back to a ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) or will be shortly so that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) will not be the owners
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2021, 22:54:32 »

The 365s have been handed back to a ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) or will be shortly so that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) will not be the owners

Since 2019 the 365s were owned by Train Fleet (2019) Ltd, which is the ROSCO of last resort. it was set up then to buy them back from RBS as "unwanted", and is a subsidiary of DfT OLR Holdings Limited - as are London North Eastern Railway Limited and Northern Trains Limited. I can't see any news of them being sold on - indeed, the company's latest, and also first, accounts (for the year to March 2020) say:

"Since the start of trading, the majority of the Company's fleet of Class 365 trains has continued to operate in passenger traffic, earning rental income for the company. The rental income is expected to continue to allow it to generate positive cash flow for the foreseeable future. The remainder is in store and available to rent.

There is an ongoing stream of potential rental opportunities for the remainder of the fleet, and these are being continuously explored, but the nature of the UK (United Kingdom) rollings stock market is that these take many months or years to mature.
"

Funny idea of foreseeable future, eh? The tangible assets of the company (i.e. trains) were listed as £102,393, marked down from the purchase price of £123,639. At that price one would be quite cheap to buy to convert into a house, wouldn't it?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2021, 11:32:05 »

Don't forget that other parts of the 'Networker' fleet are still in service the 465 & 466 built ate York between 1991 and 1994 by BREL (British Rail Engineering Ltd) / ABB
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6439


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2021, 13:55:10 »

The obvious question - is there something wrong with the 365 as a class that has led to their early (in comparison to other trains) departure?
Logged

Now, please!
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2021, 13:59:18 »

We were extremely close to getting some of them for the GWR (Great Western Railway) franchise alongside the 387s.  In the end more new 387s were ordered.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page