This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374207/11010/28]
Posted by grahame at 08:33, 16th April 2026
 
The Railway Gazette seem to have pulled all their Go Op articles ....

Indeed.  I wonder why. ` When we noted the disappearance of an article yesterday, I looked (but without success) to find it on the way-back machine ...

Re: Somerset lighthouse has been the wrong colour for 160 years
In "The Lighter Side" [374206/31884/30]
Posted by Mark A at 08:28, 16th April 2026
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
He might have done but perhaps also have designed it a completely different width.

Mark

Questions asked by Jo Public - passenger information still needed
In "Introductions and chat" [374205/31885/1]
Posted by grahame at 08:27, 16th April 2026
 


I read (and occasionally contribute) to a number of international travel sites ... and some of them remind me of the issues and challenges people face as they plan their travel.  What is, perhaps, obvious to me may not be to others.  I wondered whether to post in "the lighter side" but, no, these are serious people making serious enquiries, and we "seasoned" travel and transport advocates on the Coffee shop should respect, listen to, and help these people - by doing so, we also help the systems we are advocating that they use. 
 
Hello! What’s the best train route to get from London to Liverpool?

Flying to Amsterdam in July. What is the best mode of transportation from the airport to a hotel across from the central train station?

How is Ireland right now? Are there issues?

Big trip planned with a tour company for Italy, France, Austria, Germany. Afraid to book it as to what’s going on in the world. Have never been to Europe!!

Just stating to think about a river type cruise in Norway. Any real life experiences out there to share?

I am very interested to see what this group can enlighten me about travel for older folks, other tips & ideas to make travel easier.

I’m hoping some of the travelers out there might be able to help me. I am  a senior doing my first solo. I may have bit off more than I can chew. l arrive at terminal two Manchester and I need to get to the train station to continue on Birmingham. I’ve tried to watch a few videos and YouTube and I’ve tried to do some research on Google but it’s very overwhelming.

Is it worth it to buy a woman’s woolx t-shirt  for 10 days in May in Ireland?  They are pricy. Does it really not smell after multiple wearings?

Do I have to have the Real ID to travel via airline within the United States or will my Passport be sufficient?

Where are the best ancient Egyptian art collections in Europe?

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374204/11010/28]
Posted by bradshaw at 08:26, 16th April 2026
 
The Railway Gazette seem to have pulled all their Go Op articles since a search returns 525 error, service not available or the 404 error The Google search has this as the first line -
Open access passenger train start-up Go-op Co-operative says 'a hostile investment environment' has so far prevented it from raising the ...

This is from the BBC
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99jmvl4m1po

The crowd funder raised £92000 of the £3+ million before being declared unsuccessful in May last year.
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/go-op-som-wilts-rail


Re: Heidi Alexander, Transport Secretary
In "Who's who on Western railways" [374203/29546/2]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:14, 16th April 2026
 
Ahhhhh, the irony!

https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/38830460/transport-secretary-heidi-alexander-car-moon-crater-pothole/

Somerset lighthouse has been the wrong colour for 160 years
In "The Lighter Side" [374202/31884/30]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:59, 15th April 2026
 
From the BBC:

Lighthouse has been the wrong colour for 160 years


Part of the red lighthouse in Watchet is set to be repainted

A lighthouse will be repainted as it has been the wrong colour for more than 160 years, a council says.

Somerset Council said the Watchet landmark's red colour meant it was not compliant with the navigation system used in UK waters, which calls for sea-facing structures on the starboard side to be green.

The council said the red paint had "the potential to cause confusion for vessels during daylight hours or restricted visibility" and near-miss incidents had been reported. It added painting the sea-facing panels of the structure green, while leaving the others red, had been agreed "as a proportionate solution that balances navigational safety with local sensitivities".

The lighthouse was built in 1862 at a cost of £75 by Hennet, Spinks and Else of Bridgwater, based on a design by James Abernathy, whose work was chosen over that of Isambard Kingdom Brunel.

The light emitted from the building is green and can be seen as far as nine miles (14.5km) out, but Watchet's harbourmaster Captain Jessica Tyson said green paint would help the building itself be identified correctly by seafarers.

As first reported by the West Somerset Free Press, the issue was discussed at a meeting of the town's harbour advisory committee which followed a 2025 inspection of the lighthouse by Trinity House - the designated lighthouse authority in the UK.

This inspection found the lighthouse's colour did not comply with regulations set out by the International Organisation for Marine Aids to Navigation.

Watchet's mayor, Loretta Whetlor, said the change in colour was needed to ensure the town complied with the body's rules. Whetlor, who is also chair of the harbour advisory committee, said the front panels of the lighthouse would be painted green and the back could be left red, which she thought would look "quite nice".

Somerset Council said it had a legal responsibility to ensure the safe navigation of vessels entering and leaving the harbour. No instruction to carry out the work has yet been issued yet, the council added.


My highlighting: if chosen, IKB would have got that detail right.

Re: Portishead Line - possible meeting of forum members to explore the route?
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374201/31490/28]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:15, 15th April 2026
 
Quoting from a related topic on the Coffee Shop forum:


I did manage a trip to the area at the end of last month taking some images with a view of returning in a couple of years to see how it has changed.
...

The X4 bus provided an excellent means of achieving all this as it stops near to all locations I needed to visit, which also included Pill and the site of the old station at Ashton Gate .  The main hinderance of it being that I had to walk a mile or so from Temple Meads to catch it from The Centre stop, and on the way back a similar length of walk from Bower Ashton to Parson Street station.  That does though demonstrate that the two services should be able to co-exist and complement, rather than compete, with each other as there will be a clear winner depending on where you are going to.

I can certainly recommend it to forum members as an interesting way to while away a day as there's plenty of things both new and old to see.


With many thanks to IndustryInsider for his update post here, may I also resurrect a parallel topic, at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=31490.0 ?

I remain keen to do this, particularly now we have some rather warmer weather and more daylight.  Any takers?

CfN.

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374200/231/28]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:07, 15th April 2026
Already liked by IndustryInsider
 

I did manage a trip to the area at the end of last month taking some images with a view of returning in a couple of years to see how it has changed.
...

The X4 bus provided an excellent means of achieving all this as it stops near to all locations I needed to visit, which also included Pill and the site of the old station at Ashton Gate .  The main hinderance of it being that I had to walk a mile or so from Temple Meads to catch it from The Centre stop, and on the way back a similar length of walk from Bower Ashton to Parson Street station.  That does though demonstrate that the two services should be able to co-exist and complement, rather than compete, with each other as there will be a clear winner depending on where you are going to.

I can certainly recommend it to forum members as an interesting way to while away a day as there's plenty of things both new and old to see.


With many thanks to IndustryInsider for his update post here, may I also resurrect a parallel topic, at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=31490.0 ?

I remain keen to do this, particularly now we have some rather warmer weather and more daylight.  Any takers?

CfN.

Re: Railway bridges struck by road vehicles - merged topic, ongoing discussion
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [374199/8910/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:46, 15th April 2026
 
From the BBC:

Road lowering at 'most bashed' bridge near Hinckley set to start


Lorries regularly misjudge the A5 Watling Street bridge's height

Long-awaited work to try to prevent lorries striking a low bridge dubbed "Britain's most bashed" is to start in the summer.

Developers have confirmed plans to lower the carriageway of the A5 Watling Street, near Hinckley in Leicestershire, under the railway bridge.

Network Rail figures have shown the bridge was struck 22 times between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025, confirming its status as the most bashed bridge in the country.

A temporary traffic regulation order, published on Wednesday, said the road lowering would be part of a wider series of highways works set to start on 5 May and take up to a year.

Hinckley and Bosworth MP Luke Evans said he had been told the road lowering would take place in the summer holidays over a two-week period.

The road-lowering plan was approved when permission was granted for a large logistics park near the bridge in June 2023.

Developer Mountpark said it would fund the project. The firm's senior development director Tom Kilmister said the order had been agreed with National Highways.

"The schedule of works includes delivery of the new signal-controlled site access, upgrades to Dodwells Roundabout, enhanced pedestrian and cycle connectivity, and the lowering of the A5 carriageway beneath the railway bridge," Kilmister said. "By addressing this long-standing bottleneck, Mountpark will deliver lasting improvements to safety, reducing disruption and improve reliability for the local community and the wider road network."

Kilmister said the firm was working closely with Network Rail, National Highways and Leicestershire County Council highways bosses on the scheme.

Under the proposed works, a 40mph speed limit will be imposed on the A5 between its junctions at Hammonds Way and Dodwells Road.

The traffic order allows the contractors to close the road overnight between 20:00 and 06:00 over periods while undertaking work.

Project manager Craig Tiernan told the BBC the road lowering would take place "over the summer" with the exact dates to be confirmed.

The road is a major trunk route and diversions will be put in place to send traffic down the M69, M6 and M42.

Evans said he understood the road would be closed "over a short period of a couple of weeks during the summer holidays" to allow the works to be carried out. "Our area has been waiting for so long to get the issue of the Watling Street bridge sorted. There will be disruption while these works take place, but I'm sure we can all agree that sorting this bridge is long overdue. This is short-term pain for long-term gain."

A National Highways spokesperson said: "National Highways has received notification of some initial preparation works to start this spring. However, we do not yet have any details of when the main works will start. This will need to be confirmed by the developer Mountpark."

Under planning conditions agreed with Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council, Mountpark has said it would lower the road before it starts operating its new warehouse complex. However, the firm has submitted planning documents saying the highways improvements are forecast to be complete by March 2027.

It has applied to vary the condition to allow Tesco to start using a unit at its new complex from September 2026. The supermarket giant is set to relocate from its nearby distribution centre in Dowells Road.

County councillor for the area Ann Pendlebury said: "It's good news they are committing to the bridge work. But I think it would be unwise to let them change the planning conditions. There's an agreement and it should be stuck with."

Kilmister said the recent application "seeks to allow Tesco, the occupier of Unit 1 at Mountpark Hinckley, to continue progressing towards its occupation from September 2026 whilst working around the sequencing of the highway works."

He added: "Once Tesco relocates, the existing Dodwells Road facility will become vacant. As a result, there will be no material increase in traffic flows on the local road network in the short term. Tesco's existing operations are currently not impacted by the low railway bridge on the A5, meaning there is no increased risk of bridge strikes arising from the phased occupation."


Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374198/11010/28]
Posted by grahame at 21:08, 15th April 2026
 
This, from the Railway Gazette

https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/open-access-train-start-up-blames-funding-challenges-on-a-hostile-investment-environment/70487.article

That gives a 404 error....

I've had a look around and can't see the article though I think I read it earlier in the day.  I suspect that it has been removed at / by the team at the Railway Gazette.  Articles published before and after on other topics are still available, and searching their site for the word "hostile" does not find it.

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374197/11010/28]
Posted by ChrisB at 20:50, 15th April 2026
 
This, from the Railway Gazette

https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/open-access-train-start-up-blames-funding-challenges-on-a-hostile-investment-environment/70487.article

That gives a 404 error....

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line" [374196/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 18:31, 15th April 2026
 
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06

17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 is being delayed between Stroud and Kemble and is now expected to be 11 minutes late.
This is due to a safety inspection of the track.

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374195/231/28]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 14:51, 15th April 2026
Already liked by grahame
 
That’s great - thanks, Graham.

From my Canon R5C so yes high resolution- though I purposefully reduced the file size to be within the specified maximum, I can see how the image resolution might still have been too much to handle and I’ll remember that for next time.

UK trains best enjoyed four beers in
In "The Lighter Side" [374194/31883/30]
Posted by matth1j at 14:33, 15th April 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby, MVR S&T
 
From The Daily Mash:

NEW research has found making a train journey in Britain can be survived and even enjoyed if the passenger has drunk enough.

A study of the UK’s trains, from rural routes to commuter trains, shows that once eight or more units of alcohol have been consumed it becomes a magical ride of stimulating new destinations, mysterious announcements and meetings with strangers.

Professor Henry Brubaker, of the Institute for Studies, said: “There’s nothing wrong with our overpriced, antiquated rail network that can’t be fixed by the warm fuzziness of aluminium-wrapped alcohol.

“Once lightly pissed, being in a long box fired randomly across the countryside becomes a mellow experience. Your slumped face can vibrate against the windows in a happy haze, just as the Victorians intended when they built them whacked-out on laudanum.

“Stations drift past cheerfully. The couple you’re unwillingly sharing a table with become fascinating. Even the toilets are fine when you’re urinating as freely and erratically as all their previous users.

“Whether the night train to Aberdeen, the 4.35pm to Didcot Parkway or a 6.30am commuter train into Liverpool Street, it’s just like mother said: booze is best.”

Market analyst Helen Archer said: “I drank a bottle of prosecco on the way to work in Leeds and woke up in Llanelli. So same as normal, but with prosecco.”

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374193/231/28]
Posted by grahame at 13:55, 15th April 2026
 
I have taken a look at our server operations and nothing out of the ordinary is being flagged up.  I can't be sure what the issues is (but I can make half a guess) - if you can email me the pictures I can take a look / have a go - complete the post, and also (maybe) offer an explanation; that will be this afternoon.   " graham @ sn12 . net "   

Thanks, Graham - images emailed to you.

For info I did try on two browsers, Firefox and Edge, and got the same result both times.

OK - I have them.   Not quite the problem I had guessed!  They are very high resolution indeed.  The attachment code on the forum sorts expands images fully (pixel by pixel) as it saves them - it's done as a security check to make sure there are no nasties in there an that visitors are really getting a .jpg and not a virus.   I think I can bring them down from "print quality" to "web quality" and that will probably fix it.

OK - fixed.  I images now on original post. I will come back and tidy up the thead / perhaps worth splitting out the issue you found into "News and assistance"

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line" [374192/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 12:27, 15th April 2026
 
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 12:59

12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 12:59 will be starting late from Westbury.
This is due to a broken down train.

Could this relate to problems with the 10:36 Paddington to Exeter, off which train crew arrive at Westbury to work the Swindon service ...

10:36 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids due 13:07

10:36 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids due 13:07 will no longer call at Westbury but will call additionally at Frome.
It is being delayed at Westbury.
This is due to a broken down train.

My guess is that the 10:36 train itself is fine - that something else has sat down in the approach to Westbury which is preventing it calling there. 

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374191/231/28]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:31, 15th April 2026
 
I have taken a look at our server operations and nothing out of the ordinary is being flagged up.  I can't be sure what the issues is (but I can make half a guess) - if you can email me the pictures I can take a look / have a go - complete the post, and also (maybe) offer an explanation; that will be this afternoon.   " graham @ sn12 . net "   

Thanks, Graham - images emailed to you.

For info I did try on two browsers, Firefox and Edge, and got the same result both times.

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374190/231/28]
Posted by grahame at 11:19, 15th April 2026
 
Update for Graham: I can't get the images to attach to the post - all four are under 4096kb but it times out with:

The following error or errors occurred while posting this message:
Your session timed out while posting. Please try to re-submit your message.
No subject was filled in.
The message body was left empty.


I have taken a look at our server operations and nothing out of the ordinary is being flagged up.  I can't be sure what the issues is (but I can make half a guess) - if you can email me the pictures I can take a look / have a go - complete the post, and also (maybe) offer an explanation; that will be this afternoon.   " graham @ sn12 . net "   

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374189/231/28]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:58, 15th April 2026
Already liked by Mark A, johnneyw, Chris from Nailsea
 
I did manage a trip to the area at the end of last month taking some images with a view of returning in a couple of years to see how it has changed.

A small handful are attached, showing:

1)  The approximate site of the new station taken from the current footpath crossing.
2)  The same location looking towards Bristol.
3)  Looking towards Bristol from the Sheepway Bridge just out of town.
4)  Looking towards Bristol from the bridge by the old station at Portbury with old station building and platforms in view.

Track mostly lifted with the big work looking mostly 'ready to go'.

The X4 bus provided an excellent means of achieving all this as it stops near to all locations I needed to visit, which also included Pill and the site of the old station at Ashton Gate .  The main hinderance of it being that I had to walk a mile or so from Temple Meads to catch it from The Centre stop, and on the way back a similar length of walk from Bower Ashton to Parson Street station.  That does though demonstrate that the two services should be able to co-exist and complement, rather than compete, with each other as there will be a clear winner depending on where you are going to.

I can certainly recommend it to forum members as an interesting way to while away a day as there's plenty of things both new and old to see.

Update for Graham: I can't get the images to attach to the post - all four are under 4096kb but it times out with:

The following error or errors occurred while posting this message:
Your session timed out while posting. Please try to re-submit your message.
No subject was filled in.
The message body was left empty.
- fixed

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [374187/31163/26]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:25, 15th April 2026
Already liked by Oxonhutch, Mark A, GBM, eightonedee
 
Notwithstanding a bit of a dip over the last couple of weeks, it seems to have been better generally of late?

I'm hesitant in bringing statistics into the game as it's easy to make them fit whatever narrative you want, but pulling data from https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/performance/passenger-rail-performance/table-3181a-delay-minutes-per-1-000-train-miles-total-by-network-rail-region-periodic-1/ the average delay minutes for Wales & Western per 1000 train miles works out at:

75.5 for 2023/24 (the year Sadiq chipped in)
63.5 for 2024/25
60.3 for 2025/26 (one period of data still to be added)

Still poor...but definitely improving.

Interestingly, during the main Covid year it was 24.5 proving once again that all these delays are the passengers fault!   

The dangerous things that we do that can injure us at railway stations
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [374186/31882/51]
Posted by grahame at 10:05, 15th April 2026
Already liked by MVR S&T
 
From the Thamelink website but also elsewhere ...

More than two people every day are injured on our network because they take risks running for trains, obstructing train doors and carrying excess luggage on escalators.

Our new film, Travel Safe with Diane Morgan, explores the inner dialogue we are all faced with at train stations, which can sometimes tempt us to make the wrong decision in order to save time. However, these quick decisions can have devastating consequences.

Watch the video [at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xpt375MZO8]  and see if you can recognise some of the behaviours being demonstrated. Hopefully, next time you’re at one of our train stations you’ll think twice before chancing it for a train.

Re: Delay repay on multi leg journeys
In "Your rights and redress" [374185/24492/6]
Posted by rogerw at 10:01, 15th April 2026
 
Resurrecting an old thread, I have recently mad a claim to GWR following the cancellation of my 1427 service BPW to PAD and onwards to BDM. The following 1452 service came from SWA  and was only 5 coaches. The stock for the 1427 (9 coaches) was still on platform 4 and announcements advised passengers to board that train which would now travel to PAD via BRI. This I did. The service arrived at PAD at  1718, 86 minutes after my scheduled arrival. My subsequent arrival at BDM was 100 minutes late. GWR claimed my delay was 15 - 29 minutes! Even if I had caught the 1452 service my arrival at PAD & BDM would have been 40/45 minutes late. Does their system work purely on scheduled times, taking no account of reality? I have lodged an appeal and await there response.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [374184/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 09:45, 15th April 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
Wasn't there to be a concerted effort from NR and contractors to fix the many long-term infrastructure issues on the Paddington the Reading main line?  What happened to that?  Failures seem to me to be as frequent as they ever were

Yep, even our esteemed Mayor Khan chipped in with his opinions on Network Rail's performance and I believe he also chipped in with some cash, but pretty much to no avail it would seem judging by recent issues......

https://www.cityam.com/network-rail-must-improve-performance-after-elizabeth-line-and-paddington-disruption-says-sadiq-khan/

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374183/11010/28]
Posted by bradshaw at 08:22, 15th April 2026
 
This, from the Railway Gazette

https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/open-access-train-start-up-blames-funding-challenges-on-a-hostile-investment-environment/70487.article

https://www.thenews.coop/one-last-chance-for-go-op-passenger-train-co-operative/

Re: Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [374182/11010/28]
Posted by grahame at 06:49, 15th April 2026
 
https://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/26012268.funding-difficulties-lead-last-chance-new-train-service/

Funding difficulties lead to "last chance" for new train service

Plans for a new rail service that aims to compete with Great Western Railway in Wiltshire have one last chance to succeed.

Rather sadly, the Gazette and Herald has this behind a subscribe firewall. Available in public - two pictures of Go-op directors and senior management which helps confirm / clarify the team, but otherwise does little take the story forward.

Interesting to read the aim "to COMPETE with Great Western Railway".   They should be working to provide an extra service alongside the government specified services - filling in to meet opportunities that the national service network is not providing and not looking to compete (abstract business) from it. 

Interesting to read the aim "to compete with GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY".  They had better hurry up, then - Great Western Railway (as a First Group operation) now has limited life. The brand is owned by the government and is likely to carry on, mind you, under formal public control.

Independent ad-free activity and how it's supported
In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [374181/31881/49]
Posted by grahame at 04:50, 15th April 2026
 
From the Waterford Whisperer - many a true word written in jest.   
“You know the drill at this point guys, buy the dip when the stock market opens, sell at a profit when I announce my predictable chickening out and reversal of my big loud announcement,” confirmed Trump after he announced the US would block the Strait Hormuz in retaliation to Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz.

I am fully aware that the link to "other means of transport" is tenuous (but it does exist) - but please bear with me. I spotted the following on the end of the article and, awake before 5 a.m., my mind is reflecting on independent, ad-free activity and how it's operated financially.
Support an independent, ad-free publisher by buying yourself something nice in our shop HERE
This is a wider thought (members will be relieved to know) than the Coffee Shop - also a question for our "Information at the Station" project (  https://www.melkshamstation.info/ ) and for the Melksham Transport User Group ( https://www.mtug.org.uk/ ).

Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [374180/30034/5]
Posted by Mark A at 22:40, 14th April 2026

Re: Caledonian MacBrayne ferries in Scotland
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [374179/30034/5]
Posted by Mark A at 22:35, 14th April 2026
 
Oops, I'm completely to seek. She *does* have a bow door and it's not yet fixed.

Mark

From Tuesday 14 April

MV Loch Seaforth will be operating single ended with weather restrictions in place until further notice. Please note that this will result in a reduction of carrying capacity to allow vehicles to turn on the car deck. Impacted bookings will be contacted by the Port directly.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025