Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Okehampton In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [377204/18334/24] Posted by REVUpminster at 21:05, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
The date for the interchange to open is muted as the 30 August 2026 and for 175s to take over plus a diagram to Barnstaple.
| Re: Stonehenge - Love it or hate it? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [377203/32211/31] Posted by REVUpminster at 20:51, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Of all the bypass plans one of the best was a northern bypass near Larkhill and Bullford Camps which would have passed the new visitor centre which wasn't even thought of then. This was the 1980s when stretches of the A303 were being dualled which lasted for about 10 years then no more dualling.
I think the Army must have objected in case a tank thought the cars were a shooting gallery.
19:38 Weymouth to Swindon due 22:00
19:38 Weymouth to Swindon due 22:00 will no longer call at Frome.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
19:38 Weymouth to Swindon due 22:00 will no longer call at Frome.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
Sun, 19 July 08:06 Warminster to Swindon due 08:58
Sun, 19 July 09:08 Swindon to Westbury due 09:49
19/07/26 09:08 Swindon to Westbury due 09:49 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Sun, 19 July 09:08 Swindon to Westbury due 09:49
19/07/26 09:08 Swindon to Westbury due 09:49 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
| Re: Broken down train - an example of explanation and minimisation of issues In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [377201/32251/25] Posted by REVUpminster at 20:44, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Only half an hour if you came for that train; 59 minutes if you just missed one. Barnstaple has a 2 hour gap tonight
and has become unreliable on Saturdays lately.
I saw at Paignton they were loading up the local trains with bottled water for customers. They keep a shed load at Paignton.
Last night because of trespassers (sheep and humans) on the track near Dawlish that stopped everything for nearly 75 minutes. A 175 working Penzance-Exeter with two sets from Plymouth was forced to curtail a training run from Exeter-Paignton-Exeter-Exmouth-Exeter-Laira to just Exeter-Exmouth-Plymouth. Both units stayed in the platform until one went off to Penzance and the other Newquay today. Reliability of some units has improved. If they can do the same with all of them there will be spare units.
They have been to all parts of the "Devon Metro" except Exmouth siding and Goodrington Sidings; a previous run there was cancelled because the train wasn't available. Paignton Sands Road is manually worked; pushing the buttons.
| Re: Andy Burnham elected to parliament, with a strong transport reputation In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [377200/32149/40] Posted by ChrisB at 20:42, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
think we all support her don't we? I don't read any dissent on that above
| Re: Andy Burnham elected to parliament, with a strong transport reputation In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [377199/32149/40] Posted by JayMac at 20:12, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
People are allowed more than one phone.
People are also allowed to gwt on with their work and lives after their period of rehabilition, be that legal or political. One in four people have a criminal record.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [377198/28982/26] Posted by ChrisB at 19:54, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Bear in mind that operators will be contracted to their ROSCOs to maintain their units - that includes various exams etc & refreshes. Being nationalised won't terminate these contracts which will & are continuing...hence these refreshes etc looking 'odd' timing wise - it'll be because their lease contracts require it.
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [377197/28982/26] Posted by FarWestJohn at 19:35, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
I think they would have looked good if they had just put green vinyl over the red.
| Re: Andy Burnham elected to parliament, with a strong transport reputation In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [377196/32149/40] Posted by TaplowGreen at 19:01, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Excellent news if Louise Haigh gets a cabinet position.
No doubt she'll be sitting next to her phone (one of them!) hoping it'll ring!

| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [377195/28982/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 18:56, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
What an utter waste of money.
Painting a train in the livery of a TOC that will cease to exist in less than 5 months. Why not paint it in GBR colours?
Painting a train in the livery of a TOC that will cease to exist in less than 5 months. Why not paint it in GBR colours?
And a waste of money? Perhaps that could be labelled at Chiltern who are busy slapping their new/adapted livery on their entire fleet of 168s and 'Explorers' currently...and they only have 2 months left as a TOC!
Compounds the profligacy.
The sort of thing people should bear in mind and reflect on when howling for more money for the railways.
| Re: Andy Burnham elected to parliament, with a strong transport reputation In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [377194/32149/40] Posted by ChrisB at 17:52, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
I understand that Louise Haig is helping to run his campaign....far better transport secretary IMV
| Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR) In "Across the West" [377193/28982/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 17:28, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
What an utter waste of money.
Painting a train in the livery of a TOC that will cease to exist in less than 5 months. Why not paint it in GBR colours?
Painting a train in the livery of a TOC that will cease to exist in less than 5 months. Why not paint it in GBR colours?
I'm not as against the new GBR livery as some, but it's not a patch on the beautiful GWR one, so I for one will be happy to see it for as long as possible.
I think that green will be the dominant colour in the west for a long while, with small (hopefully) GBR vinyls slapped on top.
And a waste of money? Perhaps that could be labelled at Chiltern who are busy slapping their new/adapted livery on their entire fleet of 168s and 'Explorers' currently...and they only have 2 months left as a TOC!
| Re: Local government reorganisation across Oxfordshire In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [377192/32241/9] Posted by Marlburian at 16:16, 18th July 2026 Already liked by eightonedee, Mark A | ![]() |
3 – The boundaries of the authority make no sense. There’s a substantial part of the built-up area of Reading in West Berks – most of Tilehurst, all of Calcot, Purley and Theale. All have good bus links to Reading town centre, two have stations on lines into Reading. Yet South Oxfordshire and the Vale are losing land to the new Central Oxfordshire authority. There will now be a single council whose elected members will be making decisions on places they probably couldn’t find on a map. Lumping the towns I refer to above is simply ridiculous.
I live in the Reading BC sector of Tilehurst and would have liked to have seen the WBC part bought under Reading. Time was when I would see a WBC mobile library plying its trade 900 yards from me, though Reading Library is less than four miles away and Tilehurst Library (run by Reading) less than a mile. Not so sure about Purley, but Theale is divided from Reading by the M4. Calcot is the RBC side of the M4, so should be part of the borough.
| Re: Local government reorganisation across Oxfordshire In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [377191/32241/9] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:14, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Likewise Devonshire although we have raised Oxfordshire's plan by one council; Devon County Council and eight district councils together with the two existing unitary authorities - Plymouth & Torbay - are to be replaced by four new unitary authorities - 'Greater Exeter', 'Greater Plymouth', 'Greater Torbay' (I've no idea what they are actually going to be called) and Devon Coast & Countryside.
Personal Opinion Alert: I have always thought, and said so in the online consultation (using more polite language), that this was, is, and will remain a completely crap proposal. Largely driven by the self-serving administrations in Plymouth, Torbay & Exeter who were seemingly more interested in retaining their own influences rather than acting in the interests of all Devonians. I think this will lead to the three urban-centric authorities sucking up all the commercial & financial resources of Devonshire with the new Devon Coast & Countryside unit left to deal with the scraps of a largely rural community stretching from Ilfracombe (N) to Start Point (S) and Holsworthy (W) to Axminster (E), around 110 miles in each direction.
FWIW my view was that three unitary authorities centered around Exeter, Plymouth & Barnstaple would have been a better model, which would have allowed the total population of c. 1,260,000 to be split into three bits of roughly equivalent size. Does Torbay warrant being a unitary authority in it's own right? Nah!
Personal Opinion Alert: I have always thought, and said so in the online consultation (using more polite language), that this was, is, and will remain a completely crap proposal. Largely driven by the self-serving administrations in Plymouth, Torbay & Exeter who were seemingly more interested in retaining their own influences rather than acting in the interests of all Devonians. I think this will lead to the three urban-centric authorities sucking up all the commercial & financial resources of Devonshire with the new Devon Coast & Countryside unit left to deal with the scraps of a largely rural community stretching from Ilfracombe (N) to Start Point (S) and Holsworthy (W) to Axminster (E), around 110 miles in each direction.
FWIW my view was that three unitary authorities centered around Exeter, Plymouth & Barnstaple would have been a better model, which would have allowed the total population of c. 1,260,000 to be split into three bits of roughly equivalent size. Does Torbay warrant being a unitary authority in it's own right? Nah!
Loud applause, agree 100%.
In the case of Plymouth, Tudor Evans is relishing the opportunity to expand his empire.
| Re: Andy Burnham elected to parliament, with a strong transport reputation In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [377190/32149/40] Posted by JayMac at 15:59, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Excellent news if Louise Haigh gets a cabinet position.
| Re: Routeing Guide - effect of VIAs ? In "Fare's Fair" [377189/32249/4] Posted by JayMac at 15:50, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Hard to work out without station names.
What's the routeing printed on ticket?
Otherwise its a rather convoluted academic exercise that may well not give a definitive answer.
Plus, I've got cricket to watch!
| Re: Investigation into parking tickets for drivers queuing at petrol stations In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [377188/32243/51] Posted by JayMac at 15:41, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Well, they've all managed to agree to have a private parking cowboy.

| Re: Local government reorganisation across Oxfordshire In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [377185/32241/9] Posted by ChrisB at 15:04, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
There was a (half) sensible suggestion that local government reorganisation should align with the new ICB (Integrated Care Boards), as they will have to jointly manage and fund social care. This will be a test of the new PMs thoughts on improving social care. The relevant ICB in this case is Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire,
Superceded by the Thames Valley ICB on April 1st this year.
On 1 April, 2026, NHS Thames Valley Integrated Care Board was established to plan and oversee health and care services for the 2.5 million people who live in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire. Our creation brings together the former NHS Frimley and NHS Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West (BOB) Integrated Care Boards into a single organisation with one shared vision for improving health across the Thames Valley.
4 – This is also going to perpetuate the battles between the Oxfordshire authorities on the sharing out of housing allocations. Central Oxfordshire will refuse to increase housing numbers, Ridgeway will try to put them all in Thame and Didcot but face pressure from Reading to bear their share of their numbers, North Oxfordshire and Ridgeway will push back against Central Oxfordshire, pointing out (correctly) that there’s plenty of “grey belt” around the city, so none of them will produce compliant local plans.
Greater Oxford (that will be its name) will be building 40,000 houses (many low-rent) in the grey-belt just gobbled up from the surrounding Districts. Pity Weston-on-the-Green, for example. Currently a small village in the Green Belt, now determined to be grey-belt & likely to become a very large village....
But the requirement on surrounding councils to take Oxford's allocation has been extinguished as part f this exercise.
I completely concur with the post above from Richard Fairhurst.
| Re: Local government reorganisation across Oxfordshire In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [377184/32241/9] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 14:07, 18th July 2026 Already liked by eightonedee | ![]() |
Back to Oxfordshire - Words (almost) fail me!
I cannot think of any local government reorganisation proposal that is as badly thought out as this (and the competition over the last 50 years is pretty fierce), in particular, the one that affects me directly, the proposed new Ridgeway Council.
I cannot think of any local government reorganisation proposal that is as badly thought out as this (and the competition over the last 50 years is pretty fierce), in particular, the one that affects me directly, the proposed new Ridgeway Council.
From the northern half of the county, I agree. The new Northern Oxfordshire council is too small to be viable and is going to be dominated even more by motorists yammering on about free parking, especially when the Witney lot realise something has to give in what'll be a very financially stretched council.
A single Oxfordshire council was the only option that ever made sense. This decision doesn't and has the stench of political mates protecting their own.
| Re: Canadian Wildfire.............. In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [377182/32252/52] Posted by Andy E at 13:33, 18th July 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
That train crew were lucky to survive. We’re visiting family in north Michigan. These wildfires are causing real issues here. For the last few days we’ve been advised to stay indoors. The air quality index for today is 65 “moderate”. Yesterday and the day before it varied between 430 and 500 “Hazardous”. By comparison I see that the AQI for Chippenham is currently 3!
| Re: Stonehenge - Love it or hate it? In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [377181/32211/31] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 13:14, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Hate it !
A right royal pain in the *** when you have to drive along the A303, only to be faced with queuing traffic. Why? because the delightful traveller in front of you has slowed down to 15mph while they gawp out the window at the magical marvel. A picturesque rubber-necking you may call it.
The sooner the build a chuffin big hedge in front of it, the better, cause the tunnel is never going to happen !
[rant over]
A right royal pain in the *** when you have to drive along the A303, only to be faced with queuing traffic. Why? because the delightful traveller in front of you has slowed down to 15mph while they gawp out the window at the magical marvel. A picturesque rubber-necking you may call it.
The sooner the build a chuffin big hedge in front of it, the better, cause the tunnel is never going to happen !

[rant over]
I confess to being one of those happy to go past slowly. Only adds a few minutes to the overall journey time for a rather special sight (and site). If it causes a delay long enough to worry about then an alternative route would probably be quicker.
| Re: Cumbria Travel Pass to simplify sustainable travel across the Lake District In "Fare's Fair" [377179/32246/4] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 13:04, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
Doesn't strike me as a particular bargain, particularly as you'd still have to pay extra (albeit discounted) on some rides. I think it would only be worthwhile if I planned to cover a lot of ground enjoying the view in one day rather than spending much time anywhere.
| Re: Canadian Wildfire.............. In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [377178/32252/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:33, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
I did see that BBC news item earlier, but on my initial speed-reading of it, I had the impression that it was about "Dramatic video shows wildlife surround freight train in Canada".
CfN.

| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377176/32077/20] Posted by ChrisB at 12:08, 18th July 2026 | ![]() |
[snip]
Current Situation
essentially, the main problem is that Network Rail engineers think that the correct height restriction should be 3.9m but Wiltshire Highways think that 4.1m is right.
[snip]
Current Situation
essentially, the main problem is that Network Rail engineers think that the correct height restriction should be 3.9m but Wiltshire Highways think that 4.1m is right.
[snip]
So.....what vehicles would not be restricted by the council, but would be by Network Rail?
(I'm sorry, I don't know the heiht of commercial vehicles)
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [377175/32077/20] Posted by grahame at 12:00, 18th July 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
And from (Wiltshire) Councillor Nigel White in who's ward THAT bridge lies
https://www.winsley.org.uk/news/a-bridge-too-far-update-from-unitary-cllr-nigel-white
[snip]
Current Situation
It was time to get something done. The strikes continued, every one requiring Network Rail to hold trains until an inspection had been done.
The strike on the 23rd March had caused 38 full and 39 partial train cancellations; this was costing Network Rail serious money, Network Rail wanted something done too, and they were prepared to discuss funding risk mitigation measures. One of the many things suggested by residents to me was some sort of sensor activated sign before Winsley roundabout warning high vehicles to turn around. This option was discussed positively by both parties. The estimated cost would be around £25k. which Network Rail would fund and Wiltshire Highway would install. Network Rail also proposed putting up a temporary electronic sign until a permanent solution was installed. This was sounding like something was going to get done, and it still may, however, new options have entered the discussion, which might produce better results, but they will take longer and cost more. Please read the attached Meeting Notes and supporting slides for details.
Essentially, the main problem is that Network Rail engineers think that the correct height restriction should be 3.9m but Wiltshire Highways think that 4.1m is right.
If that sounds intractable, fear not, Network Rail need to get something done and I’m going to make it my mission to get something done, because residents need something to be done!
[snip]
Current Situation
It was time to get something done. The strikes continued, every one requiring Network Rail to hold trains until an inspection had been done.
The strike on the 23rd March had caused 38 full and 39 partial train cancellations; this was costing Network Rail serious money, Network Rail wanted something done too, and they were prepared to discuss funding risk mitigation measures. One of the many things suggested by residents to me was some sort of sensor activated sign before Winsley roundabout warning high vehicles to turn around. This option was discussed positively by both parties. The estimated cost would be around £25k. which Network Rail would fund and Wiltshire Highway would install. Network Rail also proposed putting up a temporary electronic sign until a permanent solution was installed. This was sounding like something was going to get done, and it still may, however, new options have entered the discussion, which might produce better results, but they will take longer and cost more. Please read the attached Meeting Notes and supporting slides for details.
Essentially, the main problem is that Network Rail engineers think that the correct height restriction should be 3.9m but Wiltshire Highways think that 4.1m is right.
If that sounds intractable, fear not, Network Rail need to get something done and I’m going to make it my mission to get something done, because residents need something to be done!
[snip]
Not only residents need something done - so do rail passengers passing through the area, and those who aren't even in the immediate area but are trying to catch trains that are cancelled or delayed as a result.














