Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374906/31978/4] Posted by Fourbee at 12:14, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
The 16:39 from Melksham ran on time ... then an hour to wait in Swindon for the 18:04 to Paddington. Good job I am "robust" as at around 17:30 that flagged up as "delayed". No indication why, no indication by how much ... and so a quick trip to the staffed counter where they told me it hadn't yet left Gloucester
Glasd they provided an answer to the meaning of "delayed" - train not moving yet towards destination & until it does, we are unable to work out an estimate of the amount of delay....just still getting later basically.
, so if/when it starts moving. Personally I think "delayed" can impart a lot of false hope.| Re: 13th December 2026 - Great Western returns to public ownership In "Across the West" [374905/31999/26] Posted by ChrisB at 12:00, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Well, AI is mistaken in those dates dates quoted.
Core term expired 22 June 2025; contract end date not until 25 June 2028.
According to the TSSA Union's website....
| Re: 13th December 2026 - Great Western returns to public ownership In "Across the West" [374904/31999/26] Posted by JohnM at 11:52, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
AI says it is, so it must be true

The timing for Great Western Railway (GWR) returning to public ownership is based on the government's phased nationalization schedule under the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024.
While specific dates for later transitions can occasionally shift based on the exact end of franchise periods, the December 13, 2026 date aligns with the expected expiration of GWR's current contract.
Why this date?
* Contract Expiry: The government is bringing operators back into public hands as their existing private contracts expire to avoid paying compensation to the private firms. GWR's current agreement with the Department for Transport (DfT) is scheduled to conclude in late 2026.
* The Three-Month Rollout: Since the 2024 Act, the government has been nationalizing roughly one operator every quarter. For example, South Western Railway transitioned in 2025, and West Midlands Trains followed in early 2026.
* Autumn 2026 Window: Official projections and timelines from the DfT and major news trackers (such as The Guardian's nationalization tracker) place GWR in the "Autumn 2026" bracket, specifically targeting mid-December to coincide with the winter timetable change—a standard point for major administrative shifts in the rail industry.
The final operator, CrossCountry, is currently projected to be the last to transition in late 2027.
While specific dates for later transitions can occasionally shift based on the exact end of franchise periods, the December 13, 2026 date aligns with the expected expiration of GWR's current contract.
Why this date?
* Contract Expiry: The government is bringing operators back into public hands as their existing private contracts expire to avoid paying compensation to the private firms. GWR's current agreement with the Department for Transport (DfT) is scheduled to conclude in late 2026.
* The Three-Month Rollout: Since the 2024 Act, the government has been nationalizing roughly one operator every quarter. For example, South Western Railway transitioned in 2025, and West Midlands Trains followed in early 2026.
* Autumn 2026 Window: Official projections and timelines from the DfT and major news trackers (such as The Guardian's nationalization tracker) place GWR in the "Autumn 2026" bracket, specifically targeting mid-December to coincide with the winter timetable change—a standard point for major administrative shifts in the rail industry.
The final operator, CrossCountry, is currently projected to be the last to transition in late 2027.
| Re: 13th December 2026 - Great Western returns to public ownership In "Across the West" [374903/31999/26] Posted by ChrisB at 11:38, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Hmmm. Can't find any sign of it anywhere official
| Re: On tour, May 2026, Grahame In "The Lighter Side" [374902/31997/30] Posted by grahame at 11:16, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
That's the western end of Rotterdam Centraal, as seen by somebody still half asleep, or from a camera with a hazy memory.
Correct
On a train that could do with a visit to the carriage wash?
I think it was deeper than that - a curved window on the upper deck of a train, I suspect worn / fogged perspex. The downstairs windows were much clearer
| 13th December 2026 - Great Western returns to public ownership In "Across the West" [374901/31999/26] Posted by grahame at 11:13, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Initially from social media - I won't put this is "Rumour Mill" because it fits expectations
GW returns to public ownership on 13th December, announced this morning.
| Re: On tour, May 2026, Grahame In "The Lighter Side" [374900/31997/30] Posted by JayMac at 11:01, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
On a train that could do with a visit to the carriage wash?
| Re: On tour, May 2026, Grahame In "The Lighter Side" [374899/31997/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 10:16, 8th May 2026 Already liked by JohnM | ![]() |
Well, it's definitely not Melksham.

| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374898/31978/4] Posted by JohnM at 10:14, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Some of our regulars from Melksham are aware that if they want to get to London earlier than the 10:02 but not pay £££ for the 08:02, they should split at Chippenham, and use part of their saving for a coffee at the Hungry Hare.
I'll try to remember that - thanks 
| Re: On tour, May 2026, Grahame In "The Lighter Side" [374897/31997/30] Posted by stuving at 09:53, 8th May 2026 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
That's the western end of Rotterdam Centraal, as seen by somebody still half asleep, or from a camera with a hazy memory.
| Re: Difficulty of booking international rail tickets In "Fare's Fair" [374896/31906/4] Posted by ChrisB at 09:36, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
An E* ticket to a Belgium station includes any local services for free doesn't it? So a Brussels ticket can be used for free to get to Antwerp? Or has that been stopped?
| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374895/31978/4] Posted by ChrisB at 09:34, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
The 16:39 from Melksham ran on time ... then an hour to wait in Swindon for the 18:04 to Paddington. Good job I am "robust" as at around 17:30 that flagged up as "delayed". No indication why, no indication by how much ... and so a quick trip to the staffed counter where they told me it hadn't yet left Gloucester
Glasd they provided an answer to the meaning of "delayed" - train not moving yet towards destination & until it does, we are unable to work out an estimate of the amount of delay....just still getting later basically.
| Re: Mid Cornwall Metro - Newquay, St Austell, Truro & Falmouth In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [374892/27102/25] Posted by RailCornwall at 09:08, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
The article and recent testing seems to indicate that at least some MCM services are to be operated by 175s. Good move if so.
| On tour, May 2026, Grahame In "The Lighter Side" [374891/31997/30] Posted by grahame at 08:45, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Where am I this morning? Plenty of clues around - follow ups will get harder.

| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374890/31978/4] Posted by grahame at 08:27, 8th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A, Chris from Nailsea | ![]() |
Good price - but - WHY sell me a ticket that has me waiting nearly an hour at Swindon, then is followed by tight changes at Paddington and Stratford? Would it not be logical to offer an earlier train into Paddington
Could the advance ticket quotas have sold out at the good price on the earlier trains?
Maybe ... but the GWR website [new] journey planner didn't offer any alternatives at any price. I suspect that with a less frequent service at both ends of the journey, it skewed it towards the later trains in "the middle". Some of our regulars from Melksham are aware that if they want to get to London earlier than the 10:02 but not pay £££ for the 08:02, they should split at Chippenham, and use part of their saving for a coffee at the Hungry Hare.
| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374889/31978/4] Posted by IndustryInsider at 07:53, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
Good price - but - WHY sell me a ticket that has me waiting nearly an hour at Swindon, then is followed by tight changes at Paddington and Stratford? Would it not be logical to offer an earlier train into Paddington
Could the advance ticket quotas have sold out at the good price on the earlier trains?
| Re: Advance fares - hardly the most robust offering In "Fare's Fair" [374888/31978/4] Posted by grahame at 04:52, 8th May 2026 | ![]() |
The 16:39 from Melksham ran on time ... then an hour to wait in Swindon for the 18:04 to Paddington. Good job I am "robust" as at around 17:30 that flagged up as "delayed". No indication why, no indication by how much ... and so a quick trip to the staffed counter where they told me it hadn't yet left Gloucester and to just jump on the next Paddington train - 17:41. Duly done; that was on time but thank goodness I had the knowledge of systems and journey.
As I went downstairs at Paddington, first train in a few seconds was a Shenfield and excellent time made to Stratford ... the outbound Greater Anglia platform bleak / too few seats and just a couple of bus shelters; so many trains that the Harwich train wasn't even on the board. No coffee stand on the platform; staff backed by RPI checking all tickets. Busy train joined for Harwich; lots of calls for a boat train and by the time we got to HPQ just a handful of us left across 10 carriages.
Noting the train was 3+2 seating with a corridor / pathway so narrow that I couldn't get through wearing my pack - first time for that problem ...
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [374887/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 22:09, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will no longer call at Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse.
It has been delayed at Westbury and is now 29 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 22:06 will no longer call at Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse.
It has been delayed at Westbury and is now 29 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.
| Re: Outage of Coffee Shop this afternoon, 7.5.2026 In "News, Help and Assistance" [374885/31996/29] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:12, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
The Coffee Shop was offline for a period this afternoon. Problem identified, and up and running again. Excuses explanation to follow ...
It was an outage, rather than an outrage. I and member ChrisB alerted grahame to the issue - which he was already working on solving.

The Coffee Shop was offline for a period this afternoon. Problem identified, and up and running again. Excuses explanation to follow once I have completed by analyse.
No data has been lost
No data has been lost
Downtime was 15:15 to 19:45. Reason for failure - our worker server's file systems had been set to "read only" which meant that the web server software couldn't do its bookkeeping and fell over. It would appear that the company who hosts the server had been unable to collect their monthly fee ... don't know why, perhaps a glitch somewhere; when I went on and manually paid, it went through and I then had to nudge them to remove the block and when they has doe than restart the server and finally let the recpetionist know!
All done from Swindon Station, train to Paddington, on the platform at Stratford and now finishing up on a Greater Anglia service!
Freight locomotives will I suspect move to hydrogen in place of diesel. Also it should not be underestimated the use that batteries could be used to maintain even the heaviest of trains once on the move
I haven't done the maths, but I suspect that the energy density of a modern battery system (notwithstanding future improvement), is still greater than that of a comparable hydrogen power system.
And my current job encompasses looking for natural hydrogen resources ...
| Outage of Coffee Shop this afternoon, 7.5.2026 In "News, Help and Assistance" [374882/31996/29] Posted by grahame at 19:56, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
The Coffee Shop was offline for a period this afternoon. Problem identified, and up and running again.
No data has been lost
| Re: Belfast-Dublin rail to receive multi-million investment In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [374881/31995/51] Posted by JayMac at 14:31, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
No complaints about the one I'm currently on.

| Re: Delays to services on all routes - 7.5.2026 In "Across the West" [374880/31992/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 14:02, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
Latest update - I see Gareth Dennis has been interviewed - evidently Hendy didn't have quite enough muscle to throw him under the bus completely (or train!)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c1l7eyg67v3t
| Belfast-Dublin rail to receive multi-million investment In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [374879/31995/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:53, 7th May 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Multi-million cross-border train contract set for sign off

Image © Translink
A multi-million pound contract for new cross-border trains is expected to be rubber stamped by Taoiseach (Irish PM) Micheál Martin during a visit to Belfast.
The Department for Infrastructure said the overall investment totals £540m, with more than £200m being contributed by the department. The Irish government will match this amount, with additional funding provided through a peace fund.
The Belfast to Dublin Enterprise fleet is due for delivery from late 2028.
It is understood the taoiseach will be joined by First Minister Michelle O'Neill and Deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly for the signing, along with Tanaiste (Irish Deputy PM) Simon Harris.
It is one of a number of engagements planned during the taoiseach's visit on Thursday.
Martin is also due to meet political leaders at Stormont as well as local business chiefs.

Image © Translink
A multi-million pound contract for new cross-border trains is expected to be rubber stamped by Taoiseach (Irish PM) Micheál Martin during a visit to Belfast.
The Department for Infrastructure said the overall investment totals £540m, with more than £200m being contributed by the department. The Irish government will match this amount, with additional funding provided through a peace fund.
The Belfast to Dublin Enterprise fleet is due for delivery from late 2028.
It is understood the taoiseach will be joined by First Minister Michelle O'Neill and Deputy First Minister Emma Little Pengelly for the signing, along with Tanaiste (Irish Deputy PM) Simon Harris.
It is one of a number of engagements planned during the taoiseach's visit on Thursday.
Martin is also due to meet political leaders at Stormont as well as local business chiefs.
I would support battery power, and partial electrification, so as to reduce miles run on battery power.
Total electrification is rather problematic due to limited clearances under bridges, but electrification of 95% of a route is much easier.
I have long been of the view that ALL new electric trains should be fitted with batteries for when the wires come down, having incurred the expense of the equipment, may as well use it.
Total electrification is rather problematic due to limited clearances under bridges, but electrification of 95% of a route is much easier.
I have long been of the view that ALL new electric trains should be fitted with batteries for when the wires come down, having incurred the expense of the equipment, may as well use it.
Although battery electric units can work with wiring gaps, and it is realistic option on branches and lighter use passenger only lines. It is not helpful on freight routes if ever intend to work heavy freight with electric locos (and plenty of routes in Somerset and Wiltshire see heavy aggregate trains) where continuous power (and of course regeneration on downhill or slowing) is important
Freight locomotives will I suspect move to hydrogen in place of diesel. Also it should not be underestimated the use that batteries could be used to maintain even the heaviest of trains once on the move
I would support battery power, and partial electrification, so as to reduce miles run on battery power.
Total electrification is rather problematic due to limited clearances under bridges, but electrification of 95% of a route is much easier.
I have long been of the view that ALL new electric trains should be fitted with batteries for when the wires come down, having incurred the expense of the equipment, may as well use it.
Total electrification is rather problematic due to limited clearances under bridges, but electrification of 95% of a route is much easier.
I have long been of the view that ALL new electric trains should be fitted with batteries for when the wires come down, having incurred the expense of the equipment, may as well use it.
The new buzz words (no pun intended) is skip electrification and or gap electrification. Basically a small area of a few miles is electrified to charge and power trains, on the third rail system talk is of removing conductor rails in some stations where there are know trespass problems especially drunken Friday and Saturday nights trespassing.
Certainly the talk is for Southern third rail train care depots to be de-electrified with the trains moving on batteries, this is to improve staff safety, with only stabling sidings remaining electrified.
It is almost certain that all future passenger rolling stock procurement will have some form of battery powered traction system, if they have a fossil fuel prime mover this is likely to be the secondary system.














