This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
5.8.2025 (Tuesday) 09:32 - All running AOK
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [363870/29726/18]
Posted by bobm at 08:52, 5th August 2025
 
07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:34

07:45 Westbury to Swindon due 08:34 will be cancelled.

This is due to a fault on this train.


08:44 Swindon to Westbury due 09:25

08:44 Swindon to Westbury due 09:25 will be cancelled.

This is due to a fault on this train.

Why people are ripping flowers from local waterways - Nottinghamshire, 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363869/30535/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 08:37, 5th August 2025
 
From the BBC:



Thousands of plants along Nottingham's waterways are being ripped out by the root.

Volunteers have spent more than 1,000 hours during the summer getting rid of Himalayan balsam - often seen in swathes with pretty pink flowers. But the invasive species, originating from the harsh mountain conditions of the Himalayas, is thriving here in the UK at the risk of local ecosystems.

Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust has been running a project to protect wildlife and get rid of the invasive plants.

Himalayan balsam is a wild flowering plant that can grow up to two metres tall and grows large pink, bonnet-shaped flowers. Although they originate from the Himalayas, they are commonly seen in the UK, particularly along riverbanks.

Miriam Lawley, from Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust, is helping to deliver the 'Thriving in a Wilder Trent Project'. She explained that the plant was first introduced to the UK almost 200 years ago. "It was brought over first by the Victorians," she said. "Because it was such an attractive plant, they wanted to introduce it to their gardens."

Its place of origin means the "well-evolved and adapted" species can survive pretty much "anywhere", according to expert Ms Lawley. "Once it was brought over by the Victorians it kind of hit the jackpot because living is much easier here where the soil is quite fertile," she added.

In the UK, the plant is typically found along waterways because rivers and streams help to spread its seed. Because of that, the plant is prevalent on sites along the River Trent, including Attenborough Nature Reserve.

The plant usually starts to appear in May - or April, following a warm winter - and is found throughout the summer until August.

The species has an "explosive seed pod mechanism" which helps it scatter its seeds. Each individual plant can produce up to 800 seeds and and once ripe, the seed pods split open, spreading them as far as about seven metres.

"It very rapidly becomes a big problem in the UK when you have that many seeds spreading over such a large area," Ms Lawley said.

It was that mechanism that helped the plant spread beyond Victorian gardens and into natural areas. While Himalayan balsam might look pretty once flowered, it comes with a threat to local biodiversity, Ms Lawley said. By taking over large areas of natural land, the plant "out-competes" a lot of native plants that insects rely on.

Ms Lawley said: "One of the things that a lot of people think about Himalayan balsam is that it's really good for bees because we often see a lot of them flying around. Many of them are attracted to this really sweet smell but a lot of them can't actually get into the deep flowers to get the pollen because they've not evolved alongside this kind of flower. So we actually find that there's a lot of insect declines where Himalayan balsam is really prevalent, as well as the decline in native plants."

(BBC article continues)


Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363868/29650/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:27, 5th August 2025
 
Cancellations to services between Reading and London Paddington

Due to a points failure between Reading and London Paddington some lines are blocked.

Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Disruption is expected until 11:00 05/08.

Herefordshire canal trust volunteers hope to restore off-road route: August 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363867/30534/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 07:05, 5th August 2025
 
From the BBC:



A volunteer group said it wants to re-establish a historic off-road public route leading in and out of Hereford.

The Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Canal Trust (H&GCT) said restoring the link from Aylestone Park to the transport hub at the railway station, which is currently being built, would be a good fit with the city's transport plans.

The quarter-mile long tunnel is now largely filled with soil and industrial waste.

A Herefordshire Council spokesperson said it could "make a positive contribution to sustainable transport links across the city", adding the authority would continue to assist the trust in developing the plans.

"We would do the actual work ourselves," said Tony Higgins, H&GCT's membership secretary. "We have a hatful of people who want to get down there and make a start."



Where the route passes through industrial and retail estates, the trust would need to negotiate with the owners. "We would only need a small strip," added Mr Higgins.

The group also wants to restore the canal itself between the Aylestone Park section and the eastern end of the tunnel. "A walkway would be a win in the meantime," said Mr Higgins. "As a canal trust, we have to believe."


Re: Bath and Wiltshire Metro
In "TransWilts line" [363865/30454/18]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 06:33, 5th August 2025
 
Hmm.  I commend the scheme, obviously and absolutely, but would like to clarify exactly how much is being discussed here:

The headline from Melksham News, dated 30 July 2025, is
Talks held in Melksham to advance £30m train service plan

While the headline from the Gazette & Herald, dated 4 August 2025, is
Wiltshire's railway system to be transformed in £50m scheme

Has the cost of the scheme really already gone up by £20m in five days?


Re: Bath and Wiltshire Metro
In "TransWilts line" [363863/30454/18]
Posted by grahame at 06:08, 5th August 2025
 
And as reported in the Gazette and Herald

As often if the case, public comment is interesting

This is ridiculous GWR cant even run a reliable service now let alone adding more trains. We were promised 5 car trains on the Portsmouth to Cardiff route years ago and they spent a fortune lengthening the platforms and have we seen 5 car trains absolutely not. Any additional trains for bath rugby weekends absolutely not the railways are a joke. Don't get me started on train drivers pay which is so much they don't have to work weekends so most trains are therefore cancelled because this stupid government failed to change their working practices.

You are correct, it’s only two carriages, absolutely pathetic.  Air conditioning that’s mostly not working or if it is working it’s blowing out warm air so the guard opens the windows.   On the Welsh trains some routes have a trolley service, you may remember the Inter City 125 service with the dining car with a chef for a hot meal , that’s long gone now.

I'm cautiously excited about this prospect. I'm not sure what the odds of it making the journey from plan through to completion are, but if it did, it'd be a tremendous improvement for the area. Right now people are effectively forced into driving everywhere, and the roads really aren't up to the task. Having other options would be wonderful and could allow for some much more sensible housing development than the current approach, which mostly seems to consist of sticking a bunch of 5-bed mini-mansions in the middle of a field, joining it to a creaking road system and letting God sort the traffic out.

The comment added to the story on Facebook are interesting too

Where’s the money then? I personally can’t see any of this happening in my lifetime. Corsham station should be reopened first. More wishful thinking on the supporters.

There going to be on time.and they’ve employed a leaf sweeper full time.and a heated front bumper just in case it snows.

How is this going to be funded at a time when the country is £3 trillion in debt?

Getting changed ready for the OHLE to be installed

Some valid concerns and questions.  Some - such as funding - addressed in the article but having a political point made.

Personal view - it's a prospect that could and probably should be taken much further and could be achieved.  I am reminded of the rolling of eyes and putdowns we got when we asked for an improvement from the two trains each way per day in my home town in Melksham.  Now - scheduled at least - 9 each way during the week and 7 at weekends.

Totally granted that we have a major reliability problem at present, and fixing that is necessary in parallel to looking further ahead. Suggestions that we wait to look forward until the current operational mess is sorted out, or that the people involved can't run the current system so couldn't sort out an improved one are off the mark - indeed with the more robust infrastructure some of the operational nightmares would be reduced.

Re: Eurostar - occasional widespread disruption and delays for passengers (merged posts)
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [363861/26929/52]
Posted by stuving at 22:21, 4th August 2025
 
SNCF were not saying much about what that was caused by. It was electrical, in the supply to the OLE, and they said early on they knew what the fault was. It required substantial repairs - about ten hours by the time trains ran again. But losing the capacity of the LGV for that long inevitably takes out a lot of trains, only a fraction of which can be routed along other lines.

Re: More than 12,000 back Cornwall as fifth nation
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363860/30521/31]
Posted by bobm at 20:40, 4th August 2025
 
It’ll put the rail fares up.

Re: Eurostar - occasional widespread disruption and delays for passengers (merged posts)
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [363859/26929/52]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:40, 4th August 2025
 
From the BBC:



Passengers on several Eurostar trains are facing delays and cancellations after a power supply issue on a rail line in northern France led to its closure.

The Eurostar website shows at least nine services on Monday between London and Paris have been cancelled, while a further 15 services have been delayed.

The problem started at about 08:30 local time (06:30 GMT) on Monday and disruptions are expected to continue until the end of the day, with trains being diverted to run on slower lines.

Eurostar has advised passengers to postpone their journeys if possible.

Some services between Brussels and Paris and between Amsterdam and Paris have also been cancelled, delayed or faced other disruptions due to the rail closure, which happened on the high-speed line between Moussy and Longueil in the Hauts-de-France region.

French track network operator SNCF Réseau said on its website that the "severely disrupted" services were due to a power supply issue which required "major repairs".

It predicted delays of between one and five hours on the Eurostar, as well as its other services TGV inOui and Ouigo.

Trains between London-Amsterdam, Brussels-Amsterdam, Brussels-London and Brussels-Cologne have not been impacted.

Eurostar said SNCF Réseau had told it that one track would be reopened at 18:30 CET (17:30 GMT) and that this would "allow trains to run again on the high-speed line but with limited service".

"Traffic should be able to resume on both tracks tomorrow morning when services start running again," it added.

Extra staff have been sent to affected stations to help passengers.

August is a peak period for cross-Channel travel due to school holidays, meaning services are often busier than normal.

Monday's disruptions come nearly a month after a Eurostar train travelling between Brussels and London had to be evacuated in northern France due to a power failure.

And in June, there were two days of major disruptions after separate fatal incidents on France's LGV Nord line, which was followed by cable theft.


Re: Severn Beach Line - services and incidents (merged posts)
In "Bristol (WECA) Commuters" [363858/19689/21]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:27, 4th August 2025
 
Rail disruption as freight train blocks Severn Beach line - 4 August 2025

It's cleared now, but it caused a bit of kerfuffle this morning.  From the BBC:



Dozens of trains have been cancelled after signalling issues led to a freight train blocking a line near Avonmouth.

Disruption on the route between Clifton Down, Bristol Temple Meads and Severn Beach continued until 13:00 BST.

Great Western Railway (GWR) said the train was moved by 10:00 BST though delays and cancellations continue to affect the service.

Rail replacement buses in the form of 16-seater minibuses have been put in place but these will not run to the train timetable due to the extended journey time by road, GWR said.

Train tickets are also being accepted on a number of local bus services at no extra cost.


The inevitable 'stock photo' for their news item was used by the BBC again, but on this occasion I will grudgingly approve it.  It is at least a train at Bristol Temple Meads station, even if it is heading away from the Severn Beach Line.  Also, I'm not sure whether that is the type of train that generally goes to Severn Beach. 


Re: HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general discussion
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363857/5138/51]
Posted by TonyK at 18:13, 4th August 2025
 
A link to a thread on Bluesky that puts out feelers re. HS2 phase 2a...

Mark

https://bsky.app/profile/roadscholar.bsky.social/post/3luxcviohgc2g

Interesting indeed. The Manchester leg is not yet dead, it could seem.

Re: Bristol Airport - proposals for expansion and bus services - merged posts
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [363856/22894/5]
Posted by TonyK at 18:01, 4th August 2025
 
From the BBC:

Airport's new £60m transport hub officially opens


The new facility was officially opened by airport CEO Dave Lees (left), MP Sadik Al-Hassan (centre) and council leader Mike Bell (right)

A new £60m transport interchange has been officially opened at Bristol Airport.

The facility, one of the largest of its kind in the region, can hold an extra 2,000 parking spaces, as well as significantly expanding the number of bus and coach spaces. It will also home the airport's new "drop and go" zone and offer better pedestrian links to the terminal.

Dave Lees, chief executive of the Airport, said the new development was "really important as it represents a milestone in terms of improving the facilities for our customers". "Gone are the days of passengers having to walk up slopes here," he added, explaining that the number of bays for coaches and buses had been doubled, as well as the addition of new covered access routes, covered seating and toilet facilities. This signifies the airport's "level of ambition" as it "looks to the future", he added.

The project has taken more than two years to complete, and is part of a wider £400m "airport transformation programme" to improve transport links. Currently only about 15% of airport customers arrive at the site by bus.

North Somerset Council leader Mile Bell said the new facility was a "fantastic new piece of infrastructure" for customers but stressed that there was still work to be done. "I think we all recognise that we've still got more to do to make the access routes easier and introduce mass transit, particularly from Bristol city centre so people can get here easier, faster and cheaper using public transport," he said. Meanwhile, he added, passengers should "give public transport a try" and avoid antisocial parking in local communities around the airport.

His comments were echoed by North Somerset MP Sadik Al-Hassan, who also called for a mass transit to the airport and urged any further expansion of the airport to be "balanced with the views of the community". Telling the BBC there were "swings and roundabouts" with any airport expansion, he said: "This is allowing more people to come here by sustainable means, so I'm hoping it will help. but it's part of what needs to be a larger plan to look at how the airport sits within the wider economic area."



It's nice to see that North Somerset District Council has reconciled its differences with the airport. This augurs well for the progress of the new planning application.

Re: More than 12,000 back Cornwall as fifth nation
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363855/30521/31]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:18, 4th August 2025
 
Vatican City qualifies as a country, with a population of about 882. 

Monaco also manages to qualify as a country, with a population of about 39,000. 


Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363854/19192/50]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 16:56, 4th August 2025
Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A, grahame, GBM
 
As said somewhere else the civil service have a tendency to "gold plate" projects

Very much so.

A few years ago I succeeded in getting a short linking cycleway from the A40 (just west of Oxford) down to the Duke's Cut towpath included in the A40 redevelopment plans. The on-the-ground cost should probably have been about £50,000, so I was expecting the budget to be something like £200,000. By the time it made its way into the final programme it had a £2.2m figure next to it. Needless to say, when construction inflation meant the whole A40 project had to be "rescoped", it was the first thing to go. 

Re: More than 12,000 back Cornwall as fifth nation
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363853/30521/31]
Posted by paul7575 at 16:20, 4th August 2025
 
It is laughable how a county believe they should become their own country.
There are some strange people down that way, perhaps the sea air has gotten to them?

Never going to happen, but I guess it keeps certain people in a job
If Cornwall’s 580000 can form a country, then along here in Hampshire can we have 3?

Paul

Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363852/19192/50]
Posted by CyclingSid at 15:48, 4th August 2025
 
I think we are getting to the end game with the Queensbury Tunnel https://bsky.app/profile/runtoexploremore.bsky.social/post/3lvd4jk6m5s25.
As said somewhere else the civil service have a tendency to "gold plate" projects
A Queensbury Tunnel Society spokesperson said the £22m restoration figure was excessively high because National Highways wanted to "gold-plate" the scheme.
from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czergj97gd4o?at_bbc_team=editorial&at_campaign_type=owned&at_link_type=web_link&at_medium=social&at_link_origin=BBC_Leeds&at_ptr_name=facebook_page&at_format=image&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_id=4BF0A978-6C57-11F0-A1E2-A1905D185B0C. I am not sure I think of it as "moving forward".

Outward Bound
In "The Lighter Side" [363851/30532/30]
Posted by grahame at 15:33, 4th August 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, PhilWakely, Witham Bobby, Timmer, eightonedee, GBM
 
I hope I have this right ... MCPLMHHSDHOHOKGOLMOSAOGBGN.  21 trains, 2 buses (one of which was rail replacement), a metro and a ferry on (Google tells me) my journey of 2150 miles from Melksham to Narvik (and a couple of detours in there made the mileage higher).   I had been intending to travel to Istanbul (1961 miles), but high temperatures across Southern Europe made me take a decision to divert to somewhere supposedly cooler - though I was still in shirt sleeves all the way on the even longer trip.

Each day a wealth of experiences, and those days of experienced have continued as I explored the area.  NSASB. And I am now headed back - BMHMTLOGKH by the end of today.  So much which I might given time and motivation write up more; there is a motivation not to do it in travelogue.   But here as a starter - six pictures that show people enjoying what is around them in various ways. I have spoken with a number of interesting people, but those feature here are anonymous; a later story, perhaps, about some.  The journey has been rich in listening and observational experience.














Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363850/29650/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 13:50, 4th August 2025
 
Alterations to services between Reading and London Paddington

Due to damage to the overhead electric wires between Reading and London Paddington trains have to run at reduced speed on some lines towards London Paddington.

Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed by up to 20 minutes or revised. Disruption is expected until 15:00 04/08.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [363849/29711/14]
Posted by ChrisB at 12:12, 4th August 2025
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
A bunch of extra trains in the timetable for Wilderness Festival returnees tomorrow:

  • 0943 Charlbury-Paddington
  • 1037 Charlbury-Paddington
  • 1138 Charlbury-Paddington
  • 1237 Charlbury-Reading

The 0943 does it in 1hr09, even despite four minutes at Oxford and six at Reading. No Hanborough calls.

The up journeys appear to run from Oxford to Moreton, then reverse there, all ECS.

All but the 1237 starting from Oxford or cancelled throughout this morning. Useless.....

Re: Okehampton
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [363848/18334/24]
Posted by RichardB at 10:56, 4th August 2025
Already liked by Mark A, Witham Bobby, REVUpminster, Chris from Nailsea, Andy, TonyK, johnneyw, Pb_devon
 
There are at least three concerns over the Interchange site as far as I've noticed.

1. Road Access, Traffic is intended to feed off the A30, in the case of traffic from the west, this involves a significant doubleback to/from that road. Additionally and more significant is that the station is located at the end of a feeder road currently used for an industrial estate, there appears at present no plan to improve this road.

2. Car Park size, this seems to be small which might become self defeating.

3. Effect on the 'Town' station, this is a significant site, it concerns me that the cafe and museum might suffer if passenger numbers transfer across to the Interchange site.  The vibility of the former could be questioned.


1.   The new station is just off the main road between the A30 and Okehampton town centre (from the east).  If coming from the west, you could either drive around to it or leave the A30 earlier, take the western approach to Okehampton and drive up to the existing station.  People will have a choice.   The feeder road is actually quite a wide road already, built in preparation (well before the new station or even the line reopening had been approved) for what would use the site e.g. potentially a distribution depot.   The car park site is where Network Rail had their work base for the reopening of the line.

2.     200 spaces is pretty decent.  That's on top of the 85 or so at the existing station.

3.     Visitors to Okehampton and Dartmoor will continue to use the existing station and there will be many for whom the existing station is still the better choice.   The fact the existing station is a well restored period station, with a nice buffet, will of course help too (especially for visitors).   At the end of the day, we'll see what happens when the Interchange station opens.  My view is that it will provide an important new option for those for whom getting into Okehampton and up Station Road to the current station is a pain (and those who currently don't use the trains because they perceive that and/or that they might not get a space when they get to the existing station).   It will also attract people who would walk or cycle to the station from that side of the town (and there are more houses being built right now, as can be seen in the drone photos of the station).

The Dartmoor Line continues to go from strength to strength.  There were just under 443,000 journeys on it in 2024 - and that doesn't include Crediton which is included in the Tarka Line figures and has itself seen a huge increase in use now it has two trains an hour to/from Exeter.   In 2022, the figure was just over 202,000.  It's going to be fascinating to see what happens when the Interchange station opens.


More information about Okehampton Interchange can be found here https://dartmoorline.com/okehampton-interchange/


Re: Trains not calling at Crewkerne from 28 July 2025
In "South Western services" [363847/30480/42]
Posted by bradshaw at 08:42, 4th August 2025
Already liked by Mark A, Timmer
 
This is from the SALISBURY TO EXETER RAIL USERS GROUP (SERUG ) Newsletter No:23 JULY 2025

The issues have been caused by serious shortages of spare parts at WABTEC in Barton, Staffordshire, where the engines are sent for servicing. The C6 examinations, planned for later this year will also stretch the availability of existing units, so cancellations and 3 car formations are likely to continue.


Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [363846/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 08:41, 4th August 2025
 
Monday August 4

2E77 05:10 Oxford to Worcester Shrub Hill (06:15) : "cancelled due to late arrival of an inbound service (YI)", according to RTT.

05:23 Hereford to London Paddington due 08:24 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill and diverted between Worcester Shrub Hill and Reading.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Additional Information
If you are at Hereford and are travelling to Reading or London Paddington, you are advised to join the 05:30 Transport for Wales service to Newport where you can connect to GWR trains towards Reading and London Paddington.
We have 2 minibuses running in place of this train between Hereford and Worcester Shrub Hill. These will depart from the front of the stations and will run later than the advertised train times. For more information activate a help point that can be found at platform level.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 04:44

06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 08:44 is being delayed between Evesham and Moreton-In-Marsh and is now expected to be 27 minutes late.
This is due to a points failure.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 07:36

07:00 Worcester Shrub Hill to Didcot Parkway due 08:46 will be started from Oxford.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 07:52

07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 09:52 will call additionally at Shipton, Ascott-Under-Wychwood, Finstock and Combe.
It has been delayed at Worcestershire Parkway Hl and is now 14 minutes late.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 07:52

08:18 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington due 10:25 is being delayed between Hanborough and Oxford and is now expected to be 11 minutes late.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system earlier today.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 09:33

09:43 Charlbury to London Paddington due 10:52 will be started from Oxford.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 08:01

08:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 11:27 will be started from Worcester Foregate Street.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 08:33

10:37 Charlbury to London Paddington due 11:52 will be started from Oxford.
This is due to train crew being delayed.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 10:23

11:38 Charlbury to London Paddington due 12:54 has been cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 11:39

1W11 0553 London Paddington to Great Malvern : held Evesham (+20) and Shrub Hill, arrived Worcester Foregate Street +32 and was cancelled thereafter.

10:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill due 13:01 will be delayed between Oxford and Hanborough.
This is due to a fault with the signalling system.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 08:06
RTT reports no delay between Oxford and Hanborough.

11:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 14:44 will no longer call at Hanborough, Charlbury, Kingham, Honeybourne, Pershore and Worcestershire Parkway Hl.
It is being delayed at London Paddington.
This is due to damage to the overhead electric wires.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 12:16
Departed Paddington +33. Arrived Shrub Hill +25 and cancelled thereafter.

15:18 Hereford to London Paddington due 18:29 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill.
This is due to damage to the overhead electric wires.
Last Updated:04/08/2025 13:44



Re: Trains not calling at Crewkerne from 28 July 2025
In "South Western services" [363845/30480/42]
Posted by Timmer at 06:21, 4th August 2025
 
Due to a large number of trains needing repair, there are a lot of short formed diagrams between London-Salisbury-Exeter.

Re: Trains not calling at Crewkerne from 28 July 2025
In "South Western services" [363844/30480/42]
Posted by GBM at 06:08, 4th August 2025
 
the same time![/url]

As an aside - and not attempting to tempt providence - let's hope nothing untoward happens between Exeter St David's and Taunton on GWR's main line, requiring a diversion between St David's and Castle Cary!

If it does, at least RRB shouldn't be a problem, as schools and colleges now on holiday!

Re: Okehampton
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [363843/18334/24]
Posted by RailCornwall at 21:26, 3rd August 2025
 
There are at least three concerns over the Interchange site as far as I've noticed.

1. Road Access, Traffic is intended to feed off the A30, in the case of traffic from the west, this involves a significant doubleback to/from that road. Additionally and more significant is that the station is located at the end of a feeder road currently used for an industrial estate, there appears at present no plan to improve this road.

2. Car Park size, this seems to be small which might become self defeating.

3. Effect on the 'Town' station, this is a significant site, it concerns me that the cafe and museum might suffer if passenger numbers transfer across to the Interchange site.  The vibility of the former could be questioned.

Re: More than 12,000 back Cornwall as fifth nation
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363842/30521/31]
Posted by RailCornwall at 18:40, 3rd August 2025
Already liked by JayMac, johnneyw, Witham Bobby, rogerw
 
Kernow v Germany in the 2032 World Cup Qualifiers at The Truro City Stadium will be worth watching.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [363841/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 17:11, 3rd August 2025
 
Sunday August 3
16:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 19:26 will be terminated at Reading.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:03/08/2025 16:48

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025